HIV and AIDS Program, Population Council, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 19;13(7):e0199733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199733. eCollection 2018.
Gendered power dynamics within couple relationships can constrain women from achieving positive sexual and reproductive health outcomes. But little is known about relationship power among adolescents, and tools to measure it are rarely validated among adolescents. We tested the Sexual Relationship Power Scale (SRPS) among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) and examined associations with select health outcomes.
A 16-item adaptation of the SRPS was administered to AGYW aged 15-24 in Kenya (n = 1,101). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and theta coefficients assessed scale performance for three age bands: 15-17, 18-20, and 21-24 years old. Relationship power levels were examined and multivariate logistic regressions assessed the relationship between power, and partner violence and HIV risk outcomes.
CFAs confirmed a one factor structure for each subgroup, and thetas for final 15-item scales were robust (>.82). Most respondents reported limited power in their sexual relationships, however older respondents consistently reported lower levels of power. Relationship power was strongly associated with several outcomes, even when controlling for socioeconomic status and schooling. For example, AGYW who reported more relationship power were 12, 6, and 7 times less likely (ages 21-24, 18-20, and 15-17, respectively) to experience sexual violence (p<0.001). Significant relationships were also found in multivariate analyses for physical partner violence (all three age bands), using a condom at last sex (18-20-year-olds), and increased knowledge of partner's HIV status (21-24-year-olds).
The SRPS is a good measure of relationship power for several age bands within AGYW, and power is experienced differently by older and younger AGYW. Low relationship power was a consistent predictor of partner violence, as well as an important predictor of HIV risk. Interventions seeking to address HIV and violence should also explicitly address relationship power and utilize validated tools (like the SRPS) to evaluate impacts.
夫妻关系中的性别权力动态可能会限制女性获得积极的性健康和生殖健康结果。但是,对于青少年之间的关系权力知之甚少,而且很少有工具可以在青少年中验证。我们在肯尼亚的 15-24 岁的青少年女孩和年轻女性(AGYW)中测试了性关系权力量表(SRPS),并研究了其与某些健康结果之间的关系。
对 15-24 岁的 AGYW 进行了 16 项 SRPS 改编版的评估(n=1101)。确认性因子分析(CFA)和 theta 系数评估了三个年龄组(15-17、18-20 和 21-24 岁)的量表性能。检查了关系权力水平,并进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估权力与伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒风险结果之间的关系。
CFA 分别在每个亚组中确认了一个因素结构,并且最终的 15 项量表的 theta 值都很稳健(>.82)。大多数受访者报告说在性关系中权力有限,但是年龄较大的受访者报告的权力水平始终较低。即使控制了社会经济地位和教育程度,关系权力与多项结果也密切相关。例如,报告关系权力较大的 AGYW 发生性暴力的可能性分别降低了 12、6 和 7 倍(年龄分别为 21-24、18-20 和 15-17 岁,p<0.001)。在多变量分析中还发现了与身体伴侣暴力(所有三个年龄组)、最后一次性行为中使用避孕套(18-20 岁)和增加对伴侣艾滋病毒状况的了解(21-24 岁)之间的显著关系。
SRPS 是评估 AGYW 几个年龄组关系权力的良好工具,而且年龄较大和较小的 AGYW 对权力的体验方式不同。低关系权力是伴侣暴力的一致预测因素,也是艾滋病毒风险的重要预测因素。旨在解决艾滋病毒和暴力问题的干预措施还应明确解决关系权力问题,并利用经过验证的工具(如 SRPS)评估其影响。