• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高寒河流中溶解态氮和硝酸盐氮测定的氮去除率估算

Nitrogen removal rates in a frigid high-altitude river estimated by measuring dissolved N and NO.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 15;645:318-328. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.090. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.090
PMID:30025239
Abstract

Rivers are important sites of both nitrogen removal and emission of nitrous oxide (NO), a powerful greenhouse gas. Previous measurements have focused on nitrogen-rich temperate rivers, with cold, low-nitrogen river systems at high-altitude receiving less attention. Here, nitrogen removal rates were estimated by directly measuring dissolved N and NO of the Yellow River in its source region of the Tibetan Plateau, a frigid high-altitude environment. We measured the dissolved N and NO using N:Ar ratio method and headspace equilibrium technique, respectively. Dissolved N in the river water ranged from 337 to 513 μmol N L, and dissolved NO ranged from 10.4 to 15.4 nmol NO L. Excess dissolved N (△N) ranged from -8.6 to 10.5 μmol N L, while excess dissolved NO (△NO) ranged from 2.1 to 8.3 nmol NO L; they were relatively low compared with most other rivers in the world. However, N removal fraction (△N/DIN, average 21.6%) and EF values (NO - N/NO - N, range 1.6 × 10-5.0 × 10) were comparable with many other rivers despite the high altitude for the Yellow River source region. Furthermore, the EF values increased with altitude. Estimated fluxes of N and NO to the atmosphere from the river surface ranged from -67.5 to 93.5 mmol N m d and from 4.8 to 93.8 μmol N m d, respectively, and the nitrogen removal from rivers was estimated to be 1.87 × 10 kg N yr for the Yellow River source region. This is the first report of nitrogen removal for a frigid high-altitude river; the results suggest that N removal and NO emission from cold high-altitude rivers should be considered in the global nitrogen budget.

摘要

河流是氮去除和氧化亚氮(N2O)排放的重要场所,N2O 是一种强大的温室气体。以前的测量主要集中在富氮温带河流上,而高寒高海拔的低温、低氮河流系统则受到较少关注。在这里,通过直接测量青藏高原黄河源头地区的黄河水中溶解的 N 和 NO,来估算氮去除速率。我们使用 N:Ar 比法和顶空平衡技术分别测量了水中的溶解 N 和 NO。河水的溶解 N 范围为 337 至 513 μmol N L,溶解的 NO 范围为 10.4 至 15.4 nmol NO L。过量溶解 N(△N)范围为-8.6 至 10.5 μmol N L,而过量溶解的 NO(△NO)范围为 2.1 至 8.3 nmol NO L;与世界上大多数其他河流相比,这些值相对较低。然而,尽管黄河源区海拔较高,但 N 去除分数(△N/DIN,平均值为 21.6%)和 EF 值(NO-N/NO-N,范围为 1.6×10-5.0×10)与许多其他河流相当。此外,EF 值随海拔升高而增加。从河表面到大气的 N 和 NO 通量分别为-67.5 至 93.5 mmol N m d 和 4.8 至 93.8 μmol N m d,估计黄河源区河流的氮去除量为 1.87×10 kg N yr。这是首次报道高寒河流的氮去除;结果表明,应在全球氮预算中考虑到寒冷高海拔河流的氮去除和 NO 排放。

相似文献

1
Nitrogen removal rates in a frigid high-altitude river estimated by measuring dissolved N and NO.高寒河流中溶解态氮和硝酸盐氮测定的氮去除率估算
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 15;645:318-328. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.090. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
2
Nitrogen loss from a turbid river network based on N and NO fluxes: Importance of suspended sediment.基于 N 和 NO 通量的混浊河流网络的氮损失:悬浮物的重要性。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 25;757:143918. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143918. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
3
[Preliminary results concerning summer-time denitrification in the Jiulong River Estuary].[九龙江口夏季反硝化作用的初步结果]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2011 Nov;32(11):3229-34.
4
Modeling nitrous oxide emission from rivers: a global assessment.模拟河流一氧化二氮排放:全球评估。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Nov;22(11):3566-3582. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13351. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
5
Suburban agriculture increased N levels but decreased indirect NO emissions in an agricultural-urban gradient river.城郊农业增加了氮水平,但减少了农业-城市梯度河流中的间接 NO 排放。
Water Res. 2022 Jul 15;220:118639. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118639. Epub 2022 May 21.
6
Low diffusive nitrogen loss of urban inland waters with high nitrogen loading.高氮负荷下城市内陆水体低扩散性氮损失
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 1;789:148023. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148023. Epub 2021 May 26.
7
Indirect nitrous oxide emission factors of fluvial networks can be predicted by dissolved organic carbon and nitrate from local to global scales.从局部到全球尺度,河网的间接一氧化二氮排放因子可以通过溶解有机碳和硝酸盐来预测。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Dec;28(24):7270-7285. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16458. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
8
[Concentration, Flux, and Emission Factor of NO in Rivers with Different Nitrogen Pollution Features].[不同氮污染特征河流中一氧化氮的浓度、通量及排放因子]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2018 Dec 8;39(12):5400-5409. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201803082.
9
Low nitrous oxide concentration and spatial microbial community transition across an urban river affected by treated sewage.受处理后污水影响的城市河流中低氧化亚氮浓度及空间微生物群落转变
Water Res. 2022 Jun 1;216:118276. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118276. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
10
Surface nitrous oxide (NO) concentrations and fluxes from different rivers draining contrasting landscapes: Spatio-temporal variability, controls, and implications based on IPCC emission factor.基于《政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)排放因子》,不同景观河流表面一氧化二氮(NO)浓度和通量的时空变化、控制因素及其影响
Environ Pollut. 2020 Aug;263(Pt A):114457. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114457. Epub 2020 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustainable management of riverine NO emission baselines.河流一氧化氮排放基线的可持续管理。
Natl Sci Rev. 2024 Dec 11;12(2):nwae458. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwae458. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Divergent drivers of the spatial variation in greenhouse gas concentrations and fluxes along the Rhine River and the Mittelland Canal in Germany.德国莱茵河和米特兰运河温室气体浓度和通量空间变化的不同驱动因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(22):32183-32199. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33394-8. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
3
Greenhouse gas emissions from the water-air interface of a grassland river: a case study of the Xilin River.
草原河流水-气界面温室气体排放:以锡林河为例。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 29;11(1):2659. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81658-x.