• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不可修复的Mason III型桡骨头骨折行桡骨头切除术与假体置换术的功能结果比较。

Comparison of the functional results of radial head resection and prosthesis for irreparable mason type-III fracture.

作者信息

Ünlü Mehmet Can, Güven Mehmet Fatih, Aslan Lercan, Aydıngöz Önder, Bilgili Mustafa Gökhan, Bayrak Alkan, Babacan Muharrem, Kaynak Gökhan, Botanlıoğlu Hüseyin

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018 Jul;24(4):359-363. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2017.97682.

DOI:10.5505/tjtes.2017.97682
PMID:30028495
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The radial head is essential for the rotational stability of the forearm and resistance to valgus stress. Radial head fractures are the most common elbow fracture in adults. Various treatment options are available, depending on the fracture severity. However, the treatment of Type-III fractures is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate functional results in patients with irreparable Mason Type-III radial head fractures treated with radial head resection or prosthesis.

METHODS

Fourteen irreparable Mason Type-III radial head fracture patients treated with radial head resection (n=7) or radial head prosthesis (n=7) were evaluated in this multicenter, retrospective study. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Mayo Elbow and Wrist scores were used to determine clinical outcomes. A hydraulic hand dynamometer was used to measure grip strength on the operated and unoperated sides to avoid potential bias. Measurements were made three times for each extremity, and the mean value was recorded. Grip strength was calculated as a percentage of the strength of the unoperated side.

RESULTS

Functional outcomes for resection and prosthesis patients were the following: mean DASH scores, 25.8 and 17.2; mean Mayo Elbow scores, 74 and 84.1; mean Mayo Wrist scores, 84 and 92.5; and maximum grip strengths, 48.8% and 77.8%, respectively. The range of motion of the respective resection and prosthesis groups were as follows: flexion, 112.14° and 104.29°; extension, -10.00° and -25.00°; pronation, 70.00° and 47.86°; and supination, 70.00° and 52.14°.

CONCLUSION

Although range of motion was restricted in the radial head resection group, functional results and grip strength were superior in patients treated with a radial head prosthesis. These results support the radial head prosthesis as a superior treatment modality for patients with irreparable Mason Type-III radial head fractures with respect to patient satisfaction and functional outcomes.

摘要

背景

桡骨头对于前臂的旋转稳定性及抵抗外翻应力至关重要。桡骨头骨折是成人最常见的肘部骨折。根据骨折严重程度,有多种治疗选择。然而,III型骨折的治疗存在争议。本研究的目的是评估接受桡骨头切除或假体植入治疗的无法修复的梅森III型桡骨头骨折患者的功能结果。

方法

在这项多中心回顾性研究中,评估了14例接受桡骨头切除(n = 7)或桡骨头假体植入(n = 7)治疗的无法修复的梅森III型桡骨头骨折患者。采用上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分以及梅奥肘部和腕部评分来确定临床结果。使用液压式握力计测量手术侧和非手术侧的握力,以避免潜在偏差。每个肢体测量三次,记录平均值。握力计算为非手术侧力量的百分比。

结果

切除组和假体植入组的功能结果如下:平均DASH评分分别为25.8和17.2;平均梅奥肘部评分分别为74和84.1;平均梅奥腕部评分分别为84和92.5;最大握力分别为48.8%和77.8%。各自的切除组和假体植入组的活动范围如下:屈曲分别为112.14°和104.29°;伸展分别为-10.00°和-25.00°;旋前分别为70.00°和47.86°;旋后分别为70.00°和52.14°。

结论

尽管桡骨头切除组的活动范围受限,但接受桡骨头假体植入治疗的患者功能结果和握力更佳。这些结果支持对于无法修复的梅森III型桡骨头骨折患者,桡骨头假体植入在患者满意度和功能结果方面是一种更优的治疗方式。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the functional results of radial head resection and prosthesis for irreparable mason type-III fracture.不可修复的Mason III型桡骨头骨折行桡骨头切除术与假体置换术的功能结果比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018 Jul;24(4):359-363. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2017.97682.
2
Mason type III radial head fractures treated by anatomic radial head arthroplasty: Is this a safe treatment option?采用解剖型桡骨头置换术治疗的梅森III型桡骨头骨折:这是一种安全的治疗选择吗?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
3
Open reduction and internal fixation for Mason type III radial head fractures: Is it different from that for Mason type II fractures?梅森III型桡骨头骨折的切开复位内固定:与梅森II型骨折的切开复位内固定有何不同?
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(3):2309499018802506. doi: 10.1177/2309499018802506.
4
Arthroplasty with a metal radial head for unreconstructible fractures of the radial head.采用金属桡骨头置换术治疗不可重建的桡骨头骨折。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Aug;83(8):1201-11. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200108000-00010.
5
Long-term results of radial head resection following isolated radial head fractures in patients younger than forty years old.四十岁以下患者孤立性桡骨头骨折行桡骨头切除术的长期疗效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92(3):558-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00332.
6
Comminuted fractures of the radial head: resection or prosthesis?桡骨头粉碎性骨折:切除术还是假体植入?
Injury. 2016 Sep;47 Suppl 3:S29-S34. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30603-9.
7
Radial head replacement with the MoPyC pyrocarbon prosthesis.莫比碳假体桡骨头置换术。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Sep;21(9):1222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
8
[Fresh fractures of the radial head: results with the Judet prosthesis].[桡骨头新鲜骨折:Judet假体的治疗结果]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002 Jun;88(4):387-97.
9
[Plate Osteosynthesis of Distal Ulna Fractures with Associated Distal Radius Fractures Treated by Open Reduction and Internal Fixation. Short-Term Functional and Radiographic Results].[采用切开复位内固定治疗合并桡骨远端骨折的尺骨远端骨折的钢板内固定。短期功能和影像学结果]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(5):369-76.
10
Open reduction and internal fixation with bone grafts for comminuted mason type II radial head fractures.采用植骨进行切开复位内固定治疗粉碎性Mason II型桡骨头骨折。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Aug 16;19(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2214-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comminuted Mason III/IV Radial Head Fractures: What Is the Best Treatment Between Prosthesis and Radial Head Resection? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.粉碎性梅森III/IV型桡骨头骨折:假体植入与桡骨头切除术哪种治疗方法最佳?一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 6;14(5):1773. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051773.
2
Excision Versus Replacement in Unrepairable Comminuted Fractures of the Radial Head: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications.不可修复的桡骨头粉碎性骨折的切除术与置换术:结局与并发症的系统评价
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Jun 20;56(8):1305-1315. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00645-0. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Radial head resection versus replacement for unreconstructable radial head fractures.
不可重建的桡骨头骨折:桡骨头切除术与置换术的对比
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2020 Sep 1;23(3):117-118. doi: 10.5397/cise.2020.00234. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Indications and outcomes of radial head excision: A systematic review.桡骨头切除术的适应症与疗效:一项系统评价
Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Jun;12(3):193-202. doi: 10.1177/1758573219864305. Epub 2019 Jul 31.