Chapman Chantelle, Morgan Prue, Cadilhac Dominique A, Purvis Tara, Andrew Nadine E
a Department of Physiotherapy , Monash University , Melbourne , Australia.
b Stroke & Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health , Monash University , Clayton , Australia.
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018 Sep;25(6):445-458. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1481567. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
Chest infections occur in approximately one-third of patients following acute stroke, and are associated with poor outcomes. Limitations in previous reviews restricted the accuracy of results.
To perform a systematic review to reliably identify modifiable risk factors for chest infections following acute stroke.
Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE and AMED were searched from 1946 to April 2017 for observational studies where risk factors for chest infections in patients hospitalized with acute stroke were reported. Key words used to identify included chest infection or pneumonia. Included studies were evaluated based on methodological criteria and scientific quality. Results were collated and separate meta-analyses were performed for risk factors examined in three or more studies where quality and homogeneity criteria were met.
3172 studies were identified, 15 were eligible for inclusion. Data collection methods included primary data collection, medical record audit and registry data. Chest infections were diagnosed 2-30 days following acute stroke in ten studies. Of the 39 risk factors identified, four were included in the meta-analysis. These were mechanical ventilation: 4 studies, OR: 3.83, 95%CI: 3.21, 4.57; diabetes: 4 studies, OR: 1.06, 95%CI: 1.04, 1.08; pre-existing respiratory conditions: 3 studies, OR: 1.48, 95%CI 1.21, 1.81 and atrial fibrillation: 3 studies, OR: 1.21, 95%CI: 1.17, 1.24. Common risk factors not eligible for meta-analysis were dysphagia and cardiac comorbidities.
Evidence has been comprehensively synthesized to provide reliable estimates of the association between important risk factors and chest infection. Monitoring patients meeting these criteria may promote early identification and treatment to improve long-term outcomes.
胸部感染在急性中风患者中发生率约为三分之一,且与不良预后相关。以往综述的局限性限制了结果的准确性。
进行系统综述,以可靠地确定急性中风后胸部感染的可改变风险因素。
检索1946年至2017年4月期间的Ovid Medline、CINAHL、Cochrane、EMBASE和AMED数据库,查找报告急性中风住院患者胸部感染风险因素的观察性研究。用于识别的关键词包括胸部感染或肺炎。纳入的研究根据方法学标准和科学质量进行评估。整理结果,并对三项或更多项符合质量和同质性标准的研究中所考察的风险因素进行单独的荟萃分析。
共识别出3172项研究,15项符合纳入标准。数据收集方法包括原始数据收集、病历审核和登记数据。十项研究中,胸部感染在急性中风后2至30天被诊断出来。在识别出的39个风险因素中,有四个被纳入荟萃分析。分别是机械通气:4项研究,OR:3.83,95%CI:3.21,4.57;糖尿病:4项研究,OR:1.06,95%CI:1.04,1.08;既往呼吸系统疾病:3项研究,OR:1.48,95%CI 1.21,1.81;以及心房颤动:3项研究,OR:1.21,95%CI:1.17,1.24。不符合荟萃分析标准的常见风险因素是吞咽困难和心脏合并症。
已全面综合证据,以提供重要风险因素与胸部感染之间关联的可靠估计。对符合这些标准的患者进行监测可能有助于早期识别和治疗,以改善长期预后。