• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于数字平台的实施策略对预防医疗机构工作压力的有效性:一项为期 12 个月的随访对照试验。

Effectiveness of a digital platform-based implementation strategy to prevent work stress in a healthcare organization: a 12-month follow-up controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, PO box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Nov 1;44(6):613-621. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3758. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

DOI:10.5271/sjweh.3758
PMID:30033477
Abstract

Objectives Healthcare workers frequently deal with work stress. This is a risk factor for adverse mental and physical health effects. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a digital platform-based implementation strategy - compared to a control group - on stress, work stress determinants (ie. psychosocial work factors) and the level of implementation among healthcare workers. Methods By way of matching, 30 teams from a healthcare organization were assigned to the experimental (15 teams; N=252) or wait-list control (15 teams; N=221) group. The experimental group received access to the strategy for 12 months. They were asked to complete the 5-step protocol within six months. The primary outcome was stress (DASS-21) and secondary outcomes were psychological demands, social support, autonomy, and the level of implementation. Questionnaire-based data were collected at baseline, and at 6- and 12-months follow-up. Linear mixed model analyses were used to test differences between the two groups. Results In total, 210 participants completed the baseline questionnaire and at least one follow-up questionnaire. There was a significant effect of the strategy on stress in favor of the experimental group [B=-0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.81 - -0.09]. No statistically significant differences were found for any secondary outcomes. Conclusions The strategy showed potential for primary prevention of work stress, mainly explained by an increase in stress in the control group that was prevented in the experimental group. More research is necessary to assess the full potential of the strategy.

摘要

目的

医护人员经常面临工作压力。这是导致身心健康不良的一个风险因素。本研究的目的是调查一种基于数字平台的实施策略(与对照组相比)对医护人员压力、工作压力决定因素(即心理社会工作因素)和实施水平的有效性。

方法

通过匹配,将一家医疗机构的 30 个团队分配到实验组(15 个团队;N=252)或候补对照组(15 个团队;N=221)。实验组在 12 个月内获得该策略的访问权限。他们被要求在六个月内完成五步方案。主要结果是压力(DASS-21),次要结果是心理需求、社会支持、自主性和实施水平。在基线、6 个月和 12 个月的随访时收集基于问卷的数据。使用线性混合模型分析来检验两组之间的差异。

结果

共有 210 名参与者完成了基线问卷和至少一次随访问卷。该策略对压力有显著影响,实验组更有利[B=-0.95,95%置信区间(CI)-1.81 - -0.09]。对于任何次要结果,都没有发现统计学上的显著差异。

结论

该策略对工作压力的一级预防显示出了潜力,主要是通过对照组的压力增加来解释,而实验组则可以预防这种压力增加。需要进一步研究来评估该策略的全部潜力。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a digital platform-based implementation strategy to prevent work stress in a healthcare organization: a 12-month follow-up controlled trial.基于数字平台的实施策略对预防医疗机构工作压力的有效性:一项为期 12 个月的随访对照试验。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Nov 1;44(6):613-621. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3758. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
2
Stress Prevention@Work: a study protocol for the evaluation of a multifaceted integral stress prevention strategy to prevent employee stress in a healthcare organization: a cluster controlled trial.工作场所压力预防:一项关于评估多方面综合压力预防策略以预防医疗保健机构员工压力的研究方案:一项整群对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 17;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4585-0.
3
Process Evaluation of a Digital Platform-Based Implementation Strategy Aimed at Work Stress Prevention in a Health Care Organization.基于数字平台的实施策略在医疗保健组织工作压力预防中的过程评估。
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Sep;60(9):e484-e491. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001402.
4
Preventing occupational stress in healthcare workers.预防医护人员的职业压力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 13(11):CD002892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub3.
5
The role of autonomy and social support in the relation between psychosocial safety climate and stress in health care workers.自主性和社会支持在医护人员心理社会安全氛围与压力关系中的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 8;17(1):558. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4484-4.
6
Effect of the National Stress Check Program on mental health among workers in Japan: A 1-year retrospective cohort study.国家压力检查计划对日本工人心理健康的影响:一项为期 1 年的回顾性队列研究。
J Occup Health. 2018 Jul 25;60(4):298-306. doi: 10.1539/joh.2017-0314-OA. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
7
Preventing occupational stress in healthcare workers.预防医护人员的职业压力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD002892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub2.
8
Workplace violence and occupational stress in healthcare workers: a chicken-and-egg situation-results of a 6-year follow-up study.医护人员工作场所暴力和职业压力:一个先有鸡还是先有蛋的问题——一项为期 6 年的随访研究结果。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014 Sep;46(5):366-76. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12088. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
9
[Effects of workers' interpersonal helping behavior enhancement program].[员工人际帮助行为提升计划的效果]
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2015;57(5):219-29. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.B15001. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
10
Hands4U: the effects of a multifaceted implementation strategy on hand eczema prevalence in a healthcare setting. Results of a randomized controlled trial.Hands4U:一种多方面实施策略对医疗环境中手部湿疹患病率的影响。一项随机对照试验的结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 2015 May;72(5):312-24. doi: 10.1111/cod.12313. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial investigating process and effectiveness of a participatory organizational approach for preventing work-related mental health problems among employees: vital@work.一项随机对照多中心试验的方案,该试验旨在研究参与式组织方法预防员工工作相关心理健康问题的过程及效果:职场活力项目。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):2970. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24367-8.
2
Barriers and facilitators impacting the implementation of digital interventions targeted at mental health and musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace: a scoping review protocol.影响工作场所针对心理健康和肌肉骨骼疾病的数字干预措施实施的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述方案
Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 12;14(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02881-5.
3
A Scoping Review of Prevention Classification in Mental Health: Examining the Application of Caplan's and Gordon's Prevention Frameworks (2018-2024).心理健康预防分类的范围综述:审视卡普兰和戈登预防框架的应用(2018 - 2024年)
J Prev (2022). 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1007/s10935-025-00834-1.
4
Web-based occupational stress prevention in German micro- and small-sized enterprises - process evaluation results of an implementation study.基于网络的德国小微企业职业压力预防 - 实施研究的过程评估结果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):1618. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19102-8.
5
The effects of different types of organisational workplace mental health interventions on mental health and wellbeing in healthcare workers: a systematic review.不同类型组织层面的职场心理健康干预对医护人员心理健康和幸福感的影响:系统评价。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2024 Jul;97(5):485-522. doi: 10.1007/s00420-024-02065-z. Epub 2024 May 2.
6
Interventions to reduce stress and prevent burnout in healthcare professionals supported by digital applications: a scoping review.数字应用支持的减少医疗保健专业人员压力和预防倦怠的干预措施:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 25;11:1231266. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1231266. eCollection 2023.
7
Implementation and evaluation of a multi-level mental health promotion intervention for the workplace (MENTUPP): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.多层面职场心理健康促进干预措施(MENTUPP)的实施和评估:一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Sep 30;24(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07537-0.
8
Individual-level interventions for reducing occupational stress in healthcare workers.个体层面干预措施降低医护人员职业压力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 12;5(5):CD002892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub6.
9
Strategies for Implementing Occupational eMental Health Interventions: Scoping Review.实施职业电子心理健康干预措施的策略:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 1;24(6):e34479. doi: 10.2196/34479.
10
Facilitating stress prevention in micro and small-sized enterprises: protocol for a mixed method study to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation process of targeted web-based interventions.促进小微企业的压力预防:一项混合方法研究方案,旨在评估基于网络的针对性干预措施的有效性和实施过程。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12921-7.