Ramirez Jan-Marino, Ramirez Sanja C, Anderson Tatiana M
Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, USA
Departments of Neurological Surgery, Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
The identification of risk factors associated with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has led to significant advances in the prevention of this tragic outcome. The discovery of the prone sleeping position and smoking as two of the major risk factors (1-5) led to worldwide awareness campaigns, such as, for example, the “Back to Sleep” campaign launched in the United States in 1996, and various smoking cessation campaigns (6, 7). These initiatives resulted in a dramatic reduction in the number of children succumbing to SIDS (5, 8). Unfortunately, SIDS still remains the number-one cause of death in infants under 1 year of age in many countries, despite epidemiological and pathological studies that continue to identify additional risk factors, such as hearing deficiencies, or various genetic alterations associated with SIDS (9-11, 12, 13). To parents and families, as well as some health professionals and researchers, the sheer number of suggested risk factors and gene mutations can also be bewildering. The Triple Risk hypothesis by Dr Hannah Kinney and collaborators (14) can partly resolve this confusion. This hypothesis states that SIDS is caused by an incident in which not just one but three risk factors come together to bring an infant into a situation that leads to the sudden death. Specifically, it was proposed that those factors include [1] a vulnerable infant; [2] a critical period of development in homeostatic control; and [3] an exogenous stressor (14, 15). In other words, in the presence of two risk factors, namely being a vulnerable infant in a critical period of development, a third risk factor (e.g. an exogenous stressor) can become the ultimate cause that triggers an irreversible cascade of events leading to the sudden death. The Triple Risk hypothesis also has important practical implications. The awareness campaigns have shown that it is possible to significantly reduce the risk of an infant being exposed to exogenous stressors. A potentially more challenging task is to identify the infant who is particularly vulnerable, which is clearly one of the major tasks for research. A better understanding of the characteristics of a vulnerable infant would facilitate the development of strategies that target a specific vulnerability. Similarly, it will be important for research to identify and recognize the specific developmental conditions that characterize the critical period for SIDS, especially if they are dysregulated, or to target the important developmental and homeostatic mechanisms to prevent the death. This chapter will describe how different risk factors can contribute to the sudden death, the failure to arouse, the specific conditions associated with sleep, and the neuronal networks controlling cardiorespiratory functions and how they contribute to the events leading to sudden death. In this context we will review the physiology and pathophysiology of important brainstem mechanisms that are critical for survival, but that can sometimes fail. Understanding how these brainstem mechanisms interact with endogenous and exogenous mechanisms can also facilitate understanding of the significance of a variety of risk factors known to contribute to SIDS.
与婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)相关的风险因素的识别,已在预防这一悲剧性后果方面取得了重大进展。俯卧睡眠姿势和吸烟被发现是两个主要风险因素(1-5),这引发了全球范围的宣传活动,例如1996年在美国发起的“仰卧睡眠”运动,以及各种戒烟运动(6,7)。这些举措导致死于SIDS的儿童数量大幅减少(5,8)。不幸的是,尽管流行病学和病理学研究不断发现其他风险因素,如听力缺陷或与SIDS相关的各种基因改变(9-11,12,13),但在许多国家,SIDS仍然是1岁以下婴儿的首要死因。对于家长和家庭,以及一些健康专业人员和研究人员来说,众多被提出的风险因素和基因突变也可能令人困惑。汉娜·金尼博士及其合作者提出的三重风险假说(14)可以部分解决这种困惑。该假说指出,SIDS是由一种情况导致的,即并非一个而是三个风险因素共同作用,使婴儿陷入导致猝死的境地。具体而言,这些因素包括[1]易患婴儿;[2]体内平衡控制的关键发育时期;以及[3]外源性应激源(14,15)。换句话说,在存在两个风险因素的情况下,即在发育关键时期是易患婴儿,第三个风险因素(例如外源性应激源)可能成为触发导致猝死的不可逆转事件级联反应的最终原因。三重风险假说也具有重要的实际意义。宣传活动表明,有可能显著降低婴儿暴露于外源性应激源的风险。一项可能更具挑战性的任务是识别特别易患的婴儿,这显然是研究的主要任务之一。更好地了解易患婴儿的特征将有助于制定针对特定易感性的策略。同样,对于研究来说,识别和认识SIDS关键时期的特定发育状况很重要,特别是如果这些状况失调,或者针对重要的发育和体内平衡机制以预防死亡。本章将描述不同的风险因素如何导致猝死、无法唤醒、与睡眠相关的特定状况,以及控制心肺功能的神经网络,以及它们如何促成导致猝死的事件。在这种背景下,我们将回顾对生存至关重要但有时可能失效的重要脑干机制的生理学和病理生理学。了解这些脑干机制如何与内源性和外源性机制相互作用,也有助于理解已知导致SIDS的各种风险因素的重要性。