Department of Ecosystem and Forestry Science, University of Melbourne, 500 Yarra Boulevard, Richmond, Victoria, 3121, Australia.
Ecol Appl. 2018 Oct;28(7):1752-1761. doi: 10.1002/eap.1782. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
The ideal species for green or vegetated roofs should have high water use after rainfall to maximize stormwater retention but also survive periods with low water availability in dry substrates. Shrubs have great potential for green roofs because they have higher rates of water use, and many species are also drought tolerant. However, not all shrub species will be suitable and there may be a trade-off between water use and drought tolerance. We conducted a glasshouse experiment to determine the possible trade-offs between shrub water use for stormwater management and their response to drought conditions. We selected 20 shrubs from a wide range of climates of origin, represented by heat moisture index (HMI) and mean annual precipitation (MAP). Under well-watered (WW) and water-deficit (WD) conditions, we assessed morphological responses to water availability; evapotranspiration rate (ET) and midday water potential (Ψ ) were used to evaluate species water use and drought response. In response to WD, all 20 shrubs adjusted their morphology and physiology. However, there were no species that simultaneously achieved high rates of water use (high ET) under WW and high drought tolerance (low Ψ ) under WD conditions. Although some species which had high water use under WW conditions could avoid drought stress (high Ψ ). Water use was strongly related to plant biomass, total leaf area, and leaf traits (specific leaf area [SLA] and leaf area ratio [LAR]). Conversely, drought response (Ψ ) was not related to morphological traits. Species' climate of origin was not related to drought response or water use. Drought-avoiding shrubs (high Ψ ) could optimize rainfall reduction on green roofs. Water use was related to biomass, leaf area, and leaf traits; thus, these traits could be used to assist the selection of shrubs for stormwater mitigation on green roofs. The natural distribution of species was not related to their water use or drought response, which suggests that shrubs from less arid climates may be suitable for use on green roofs. Selecting species based on traits and not climate of origin could both improve green roof performance and biodiversity outcomes by expanding the current plant palette.
理想的绿色或植被屋顶物种应该在雨后具有高用水量,以最大限度地保留雨水,但也能在干旱基质中低水分供应的时期存活。灌木对于绿色屋顶有很大的潜力,因为它们的用水量更高,而且许多物种也具有耐旱性。然而,并非所有的灌木物种都适用,并且在用水量和耐旱性之间可能存在权衡。我们进行了一个温室实验,以确定灌木用于雨水管理的用水量与它们对干旱条件的反应之间的可能权衡。我们从广泛的气候起源中选择了 20 种灌木,代表了热湿指数(HMI)和年平均降水量(MAP)。在充分浇水(WW)和水分亏缺(WD)条件下,我们评估了对水分供应的形态响应;蒸散速率(ET)和中午水势(Ψ)用于评估物种的用水量和干旱响应。在 WD 下,所有 20 种灌木都调整了它们的形态和生理。然而,没有一个物种在 WW 下同时实现高用水量(高 ET)和 WD 下高耐旱性(低 Ψ)。尽管一些在 WW 条件下具有高用水量的物种可以避免干旱胁迫(高 Ψ)。用水量与植物生物量、总叶面积和叶片特征(比叶面积[SLA]和叶面积比[LAR])密切相关。相反,干旱响应(Ψ)与形态特征无关。物种的起源气候与干旱响应或用水量无关。耐旱灌木(高 Ψ)可以优化绿色屋顶上的降雨减少。用水量与生物量、叶面积和叶片特征有关;因此,这些特征可用于协助选择用于绿色屋顶雨水缓解的灌木。物种的自然分布与它们的用水量或干旱响应无关,这表明来自较干旱气候的灌木可能适合用于绿色屋顶。基于特征而不是起源气候进行选择,可以通过扩大当前的植物调色板来提高绿色屋顶的性能和生物多样性结果。