School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 500 Yarra Boulevard, Richmond, Victoria 3121, Australia.
School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 500 Yarra Boulevard, Richmond, Victoria 3121, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 15;603-604:340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.061. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
Green roofs are increasingly being used among the suite of tools designed to reduce the volume of surface water runoff generated by cities. Plants provide the primary mechanism for restoring the rainfall retention capacity of green roofs, but selecting plants with high water use is likely to increase drought stress. Using empirically-derived plant physiological parameters, we used a water balance model to assess the trade-off between rainfall retention and plant drought stress under a 30-year climate scenario. We compared high and low water users with either drought avoidance or drought tolerance strategies. Green roofs with low water-using, drought-avoiding species achieved high rainfall retention (66-81%) without experiencing significant drought stress. Roofs planted with other strategies showed high retention (72-90%), but they also experienced >50days of drought stress per year. However, not all species with the same strategy behaved similarly, therefore selecting plants based on water use and drought strategy alone does not guarantee survival in shallow substrates where drought stress can develop quickly. Despite this, it is more likely that green roofs will achieve high rainfall retention with minimal supplementary irrigation if planted with low water users with drought avoidance strategies.
绿色屋顶越来越多地被用作一系列工具之一,旨在减少城市产生的地表径流量。植物是恢复绿色屋顶雨水保持能力的主要机制,但选择高耗水植物可能会增加干旱胁迫。利用经验得出的植物生理参数,我们使用水量平衡模型来评估在 30 年气候情景下,雨水保持和植物干旱胁迫之间的权衡。我们将高耗水和低耗水植物与抗旱或耐旱策略进行了比较。具有低耗水、耐旱物种的绿色屋顶可实现高雨水保留率(66-81%),而不会经历严重的干旱胁迫。采用其他策略的屋顶保留率较高(72-90%),但每年也会经历超过 50 天的干旱胁迫。然而,并非所有具有相同策略的物种都表现出相同的行为,因此仅根据耗水和干旱策略选择植物并不能保证在浅基质中存活,因为干旱胁迫可能会迅速发展。尽管如此,如果种植具有耐旱策略的低耗水植物,绿色屋顶更有可能在最小化补充灌溉的情况下实现高雨水保留率。