Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Specialties, Università degli Studi di Modena and Reggio Emilia, and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Semin Liver Dis. 2018 Aug;38(3):215-229. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1660523. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
Cirrhosis represents the end stage of chronic liver disease and its transition from a compensated to a decompensated status is mainly driven by portal hypertension and systemic inflammation. Although relevant modifications in the evaluation of the coagulative balance in cirrhosis across its natural history have occurred and alterations in routine indices of hemostasis have lost their role as indicators of the hemorrhagic risk of patients with liver cirrhosis, these are still perceived as prone to bleed when admitted to invasive procedures. This view, which is still present in guidelines addressing the management of bleeding risk, makes preprocedural transfusion of plasma and platelets still an ongoing clinical practice. In this review, we describe the limitations of both bleeding risk assessment in cirrhotic patients admitted to radiologic and endoscopic invasive procedures and evaluate whether preventive strategies indicated by current guidelines can affect the procedure-related hemorrhagic events.
肝硬化是慢性肝病的终末期,其从代偿期向失代偿期的转变主要由门静脉高压和全身炎症驱动。尽管在肝硬化自然史的评估中,相关的凝血平衡的评估发生了变化,并且常规止血指标的改变已经失去了作为肝硬化患者出血风险指标的作用,但当患者接受侵入性操作时,这些指标仍被认为容易出血。这种观点仍然存在于处理出血风险的指南中,使得在侵入性放射学和内镜检查前输注血浆和血小板仍然是一种持续的临床实践。在这篇综述中,我们描述了在接受放射学和内镜侵入性操作的肝硬化患者中出血风险评估的局限性,并评估了当前指南所指示的预防策略是否可以影响与操作相关的出血事件。