Suppr超能文献

环丙沙星与左氧氟沙星用于造血干细胞移植受者的预防治疗比较

Ciprofloxacin vs. levofloxacin for prophylaxis in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

作者信息

Rambaran Kerry Anne, Seifert Charles F

机构信息

1 Keck Graduate Institute School of Pharmacy, Claremont, CA, USA.

2 Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Lubbock, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019 Jun;25(4):884-890. doi: 10.1177/1078155218787286. Epub 2018 Jul 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infection is the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing myleosuppressive therapy with the risk of infection being heightened during the neutropenic phase. Fluoroquinolones are most often utilized as prophylaxis, specifically levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin; however, there is increasing resistance among these agents. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin when used prophylactically in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study conducted at a 443-bed tertiary teaching county hospital from 1 January 2005 to 31 September 2016.

METHODS

Patients aged 18-89 who were admitted and received levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were evaluated.

RESULTS

The patient population (N = 151) was predominantly male (93 vs. 58) and the median (IQR) age was 57 (20.1) years. There were 108 patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation compared to 43 undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Significantly fewer patients who received levofloxacin (11/43, 25.6%) developed neutropenic fever compared to patients who received ciprofloxacin (61/108, 56.5%, p = 0.0006). Also there were significantly more positive blood cultures in the ciprofloxacin group (36/108, 33.3%) compared to the levofloxacin group (4/43, 9.3%); the majority of which were Gram-positive organisms (p = 0.0025).

CONCLUSION

Prophylaxis with levofloxacin was associated with a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia and bacteremia when compared to ciprofloxacin in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.

摘要

背景

感染是接受骨髓抑制治疗患者发病和死亡的最常见原因,在中性粒细胞减少期感染风险会增加。氟喹诺酮类药物最常被用作预防用药,特别是左氧氟沙星或环丙沙星;然而,这些药物的耐药性正在增加。本研究的目的是比较环丙沙星和左氧氟沙星在造血干细胞移植患者中预防性使用时的疗效。

研究设计

一项回顾性队列研究,于2005年1月1日至2016年9月31日在一家拥有443张床位的三级教学县医院进行。

方法

对年龄在18 - 89岁、造血干细胞移植后接受左氧氟沙星或环丙沙星治疗的患者进行评估。

结果

患者群体(N = 151)以男性为主(93例对58例),中位(四分位间距)年龄为57(20.1)岁。有108例患者接受自体造血干细胞移植,43例接受异体造血干细胞移植。与接受环丙沙星的患者(61/108,56.5%,p = 0.0006)相比,接受左氧氟沙星的患者发生中性粒细胞减少性发热的明显较少(11/43,25.6%)。此外,环丙沙星组的血培养阳性结果也明显多于左氧氟沙星组(36/108,33.3%对4/43,9.3%);其中大多数是革兰氏阳性菌(p = 0.0025)。

结论

与环丙沙星相比,在造血干细胞移植患者中,左氧氟沙星预防用药与发热性中性粒细胞减少症和菌血症的发生率较低相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验