Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jo Miller Orthopaedic Lab, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jo Miller Orthopaedic Lab, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Oct;33(10):3220-3225. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.047. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
It is critical that a femoral rasp be effective in preparing the proximal femur to accept the size and the geometry of the femoral implant at the time of total hip arthroplasty. Short, tapered femoral stems may be at greater risk because they require the preparation of a short femoral region without any reaming. We undertook a study to determine the effect on implant seating in femora that were prepared by rasping alone with those that were rasped and the canal was washed with saline at the time of cementless THA with a short, tapered femoral implant.
We retrospectively analyzed the preoperative, intraoperative, and radiographic data on 170 consecutive patients undergoing a primary THA using a short, taper, uncemented metaphyseal-filling stem. The femur was prepared using a rasp-only technique. In the initial 99 patients, the canal was rasped, but not washed (group 1). In the subsequent 71 patients, the canal was rasped and before implant insertion the canal was washed with 100 cc of normal saline to remove all loose cancellous bone (group 2). Intraoperatively, the distance between the calcar cut and the rasp and subsequently, the calcar cut and the implant was measured. We defined a difference of more than 2 mm between the seating of the rasp and the final implant as a clinically significant mismatch.
Overall, a clinically significant mismatch occurred in 50% (49/99) of cases in group 1 and 15% (11/71) in group 2. Multivariate logistic regression analysis corrected for preoperative, intraoperative, and radiographic measurements showed that washing significantly decreased the mismatch between the rasp and the implant (odds ratio, 5.32; confidence interval, 2.10-13.73; P < .001).
Although the present rasp design is sufficient to create the geometric space for this short, metaphyseal stem, it does not adequately remove the bone debris to ensure reproducible seating of the implant. Washing the femoral metaphysis with saline to remove bone debris, after rasping and before inserting the final implant, significantly decreased the mismatch between seating of the final rasp and the implant in this cementless short, metaphyseal-filling, taper design stem. Level of Evidence III.
在全髋关节置换术中,股骨锉必须有效地准备股骨近端,以接受股骨假体的大小和几何形状,这一点至关重要。短锥形股骨柄发生这种情况的风险可能更大,因为它们需要准备一个没有扩孔的短股骨区域。我们进行了一项研究,以确定在使用短锥形非骨水泥髓腔填充柄进行初次全髋关节置换术中,单独使用股骨锉准备与股骨锉准备并在使用生理盐水冲洗通道时对植入物的植入位置的影响。
我们回顾性分析了 170 例连续接受短锥形非骨水泥髓腔填充柄初次全髋关节置换术患者的术前、术中及影像学资料。股骨采用股骨锉技术单独准备。在最初的 99 例患者中,锉削了股骨,但未冲洗(组 1)。在随后的 71 例患者中,锉削了股骨,并在植入前用 100cc 生理盐水冲洗通道以清除所有松质骨(组 2)。术中测量了距股骨距切割面和股骨锉的距离,以及股骨距切割面和最终植入物的距离。我们将股骨锉和最终植入物之间的植入位置差异定义为超过 2mm 为临床显著不匹配。
总体而言,组 1中有 50%(49/99)的病例存在临床显著不匹配,组 2中有 15%(11/71)的病例存在临床显著不匹配。多变量逻辑回归分析校正了术前、术中及影像学测量,结果表明冲洗显著降低了股骨锉和植入物之间的不匹配(比值比,5.32;95%置信区间,2.10-13.73;P<.001)。
虽然目前的股骨锉设计足以创建这个短锥形骨干的几何空间,但它不能有效地清除骨屑,以确保植入物的可重复植入位置。在使用生理盐水冲洗股骨干骺端以清除骨屑后,在插入最终植入物之前,在使用生理盐水冲洗股骨干骺端以清除骨屑后,显著降低了在这种无骨水泥短锥形骨干填充柄设计中最终股骨锉和植入物的植入位置不匹配。证据等级 III。