Lim Seung-Jae, Kim Sang-Min, Lim Byung-Ho, Moon Young-Wan, Park Youn-Soo
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Comput Aided Surg. 2013;18(1-2):33-40. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2012.744430. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
The ROBODOC system offers the theoretical advantage of providing better fit and mechanical stability of the stem in total hip arthroplasty. However, there has been no previous study on short metaphyseal-fitting stem implantation using the ROBODOC system. The aim of the present study was to compare the implant position and primary stability of short metaphyseal-fitting stems implanted by robotic milling and manual rasping in a human cadaveric femoral model.
Eight matched pairs of human cadaveric femora were randomly assigned to a robotic milling group or manual rasping group. Operative time and intraoperative femoral fractures were monitored, and radiographic evaluation of stem alignment was performed by comparison of preoperative planning and postoperative CT data. Stability testing was performed on six matched pairs of femora, excluding two specimens in which intraoperative fractures occurred.
The robotic milling procedures took an average of 27 minutes longer than the manual rasping procedures (p < 0.001). The robotic milling group exhibited significantly better anteroposterior alignment and vertical seating, and also showed a significantly reduced variability in both alignment and vertical seating. No intraoperative femoral fracture was detected in the robotic milling group, whereas two femoral fractures and one femoral stem tip perforation were detected in the manual rasping group. Stability testing showed no significant difference in translational and rotational migrations between the two groups, although the robotic milling group showed a trend towards reduced variability of stability.
Our cadaveric study suggests that the use of the ROBODOC system for short metaphyseal-fitting stem implantation may have advantages in improving implant fit and reducing the risk of intraoperative femoral fractures without compromising primary stability.
ROBODOC系统在全髋关节置换术中提供了理论优势,可使柄部的贴合度和机械稳定性更佳。然而,此前尚无关于使用ROBODOC系统植入短干骺端贴合柄的研究。本研究的目的是在人体尸体股骨模型中比较通过机器人铣削和手动锉削植入的短干骺端贴合柄的植入位置和初始稳定性。
将八对匹配的人体尸体股骨随机分配至机器人铣削组或手动锉削组。监测手术时间和术中股骨骨折情况,并通过比较术前规划和术后CT数据对柄的对线情况进行影像学评估。对六对匹配的股骨进行稳定性测试,排除术中发生骨折的两个标本。
机器人铣削手术平均比手动锉削手术多耗时27分钟(p < 0.001)。机器人铣削组在前后位对线和垂直入座方面表现明显更好,并且在对线和垂直入座方面的变异性也显著降低。机器人铣削组未检测到术中股骨骨折,而手动锉削组检测到两例股骨骨折和一例股骨柄尖端穿孔。稳定性测试表明,两组之间的平移和旋转位移无显著差异,尽管机器人铣削组的稳定性变异性有降低趋势。
我们的尸体研究表明,使用ROBODOC系统植入短干骺端贴合柄在改善植入物贴合度和降低术中股骨骨折风险方面可能具有优势,且不影响初始稳定性。