Suppr超能文献

创伤患者在航空医疗转运中发生出血性休克风险时的院前血浆治疗。

Prehospital Plasma during Air Medical Transport in Trauma Patients at Risk for Hemorrhagic Shock.

机构信息

From the Division of Trauma and General Surgery, Department of Surgery (J.L.S., J.B.B., L.H.A., B.S.Z., M.D.N., M.R.R., R.M.F., T.R.B., A.B.P., M.S.Z.), and the Departments of Emergency Medicine (F.X.G., C.W.C., D.M.Y.) and Critical Care Medicine (B.J.E.-Y., P.W.A.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, and the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh and Institute for Transfusion Medicine (M.H.Y., D.J.T.), Pittsburgh, and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Altoona Hospital, Altoona (A.T.P.) - all in Pennsylvania; the Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville (B.J.D.), and the Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (R.S.M.) - both in Tennessee; the Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY (B.G.H.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (J.A.C.); and the Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas (H.A.P.) and Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital (W.R.W.) and the John Peter Smith Health Network (T.M.D.), Fort Worth - all in Texas.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 26;379(4):315-326. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802345.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

After a person has been injured, prehospital administration of plasma in addition to the initiation of standard resuscitation procedures in the prehospital environment may reduce the risk of downstream complications from hemorrhage and shock. Data from large clinical trials are lacking to show either the efficacy or the risks associated with plasma transfusion in the prehospital setting.

METHODS

To determine the efficacy and safety of prehospital administration of thawed plasma in injured patients who are at risk for hemorrhagic shock, we conducted a pragmatic, multicenter, cluster-randomized, phase 3 superiority trial that compared the administration of thawed plasma with standard-care resuscitation during air medical transport. The primary outcome was mortality at 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 501 patients were evaluated: 230 patients received plasma (plasma group) and 271 received standard-care resuscitation (standard-care group). Mortality at 30 days was significantly lower in the plasma group than in the standard-care group (23.2% vs. 33.0%; difference, -9.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -18.6 to -1.0%; P=0.03). A similar treatment effect was observed across nine prespecified subgroups (heterogeneity chi-square test, 12.21; P=0.79). Kaplan-Meier curves showed an early separation of the two treatment groups that began 3 hours after randomization and persisted until 30 days after randomization (log-rank chi-square test, 5.70; P=0.02). The median prothrombin-time ratio was lower in the plasma group than in the standard-care group (1.2 [interquartile range, 1.1 to 1.4] vs. 1.3 [interquartile range, 1.1 to 1.6], P<0.001) after the patients' arrival at the trauma center. No significant differences between the two groups were noted with respect to multiorgan failure, acute lung injury-acute respiratory distress syndrome, nosocomial infections, or allergic or transfusion-related reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

In injured patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock, the prehospital administration of thawed plasma was safe and resulted in lower 30-day mortality and a lower median prothrombin-time ratio than standard-care resuscitation. (Funded by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command; PAMPer ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01818427 .).

摘要

背景

在患者受伤后,除了在院前环境中启动标准复苏程序外,在院前给予血浆可能会降低出血和休克引起的下游并发症的风险。目前缺乏大型临床试验数据来显示院前环境中输血与血浆输注相关的疗效或风险。

方法

为了确定在有出血性休克风险的受伤患者中,院前解冻血浆给药的疗效和安全性,我们进行了一项实用的、多中心、集群随机、3 期优效性试验,比较了在航空医疗转运期间解冻血浆给药与标准复苏的效果。主要结局是 30 天的死亡率。

结果

共评估了 501 名患者:230 名患者接受了血浆(血浆组),271 名患者接受了标准复苏(标准复苏组)。30 天死亡率在血浆组显著低于标准复苏组(23.2%比 33.0%;差异,-9.8 个百分点;95%置信区间,-18.6 至-1.0%;P=0.03)。在 9 个预先指定的亚组中观察到相似的治疗效果(卡方检验,12.21;P=0.79)。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示两组治疗的早期分离,从随机分组后 3 小时开始,并持续到随机分组后 30 天(对数秩检验,5.70;P=0.02)。与标准复苏组相比,患者到达创伤中心后,血浆组的凝血酶原时间比值更低(中位数,1.2 [四分位距,1.1 至 1.4] 比 1.3 [四分位距,1.1 至 1.6];P<0.001)。两组之间在多器官衰竭、急性肺损伤-急性呼吸窘迫综合征、医院获得性感染或过敏或输血相关反应方面没有显著差异。

结论

在有出血性休克风险的受伤患者中,院前给予解冻的血浆是安全的,与标准复苏相比,30 天死亡率较低,凝血酶原时间比值中位数较低。(由美国陆军医学研究与物资司令部资助;PAMPer 临床试验.gov 编号,NCT01818427)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验