Bartoli-Abdou John K, Patel Jignesh P, Xie Rosa, Dzahini Olubanke, Vadher Bipin, Brown Alison, Roberts Lara N, Patel Raj K, Arya Roopen, Auyeung Vivian
Institute of Pharmaceutical Science King's College London London UK.
King's Thrombosis Centre Department of Haematological Medicine King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2018 Jun 7;2(3):497-507. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12116. eCollection 2018 Jul.
Anticoagulation control with vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be measured using time in therapeutic range (TTR), where TTR >65% is considered good and low TTR may be associated with low adherence.
This cross-sectional observational study compared illness beliefs, treatment beliefs, and treatment satisfaction of patients with TTR >75% and TTR <50% using validated tools to determine their association with TTR. Adults requiring chronic VKA therapy were recruited from 2 hospital anticoagulation clinics in London, UK.
311 patients with TTR >75% and 214 with TTR <50% were recruited. TTR >75% patients had been taking warfarin on average over 2 years longer than TTR <50% patients (<.001). Statistically significant differences in beliefs were found in all subscales other than in treatment control, general harm, and general overuse. Cluster analysis determined there were 4 distinct clusters of beliefs among patients. Multivariate binary logistic regression found VTE patients were least likely to have poor TTR (OR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.29, 0.77). Patients in the "cautious of therapy and fearful of illness" cluster were most likely to have low TTR (OR = 4.75; 95% CI 2.75, 8.77).
Illness perceptions, medication beliefs and treatment satisfaction were associated with INR control. VTE patients and those who were accepting of both illness and treatment were most likely to have optimal INR control.
心房颤动(AF)或静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)患者使用维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)进行抗凝控制时,可通过治疗范围内时间(TTR)来衡量,其中TTR>65%被认为是良好的,而低TTR可能与依从性低有关。
这项横断面观察性研究使用经过验证的工具比较了TTR>75%和TTR<50%患者的疾病信念、治疗信念和治疗满意度,以确定它们与TTR的关联。从英国伦敦的2家医院抗凝门诊招募需要长期VKA治疗的成年人。
招募了311名TTR>75%的患者和214名TTR<50%的患者。TTR>75%的患者服用华法林的平均时间比TTR<50%的患者长2年多(<.001)。除治疗控制、一般危害和一般过度使用外,在所有子量表中均发现信念存在统计学显著差异。聚类分析确定患者中存在4种不同的信念聚类。多变量二元逻辑回归发现VTE患者TTR差的可能性最小(OR=0.49;95%CI 0.29,0.77)。“对治疗谨慎且对疾病恐惧”聚类中的患者TTR低的可能性最大(OR=4.75;95%CI 2.75,8.77)。
疾病认知、药物信念和治疗满意度与国际标准化比值(INR)控制相关。VTE患者以及那些接受疾病和治疗的患者最有可能实现最佳INR控制。