Kordower J H, Bodnar R J
Int J Neurosci. 1985 Dec;28(3-4):269-78. doi: 10.3109/00207458508985394.
Acute exposure to either prolonged intermittent foot shock (PIFS) or brief continuous foot shock, (BCFS) decreases the sensitivity of rats to noxious stimuli, but differ in their mechanisms of actions. Since the peptide vasopressin (VP) has been implicated in analgesic and stress-related processes, the present study examined whether antagonism of central VP receptors with dPTyr(Me)AVP would alter the analgesic responses following PIFS or BCFS. While intracerebroventricular administration of dPTyr(Me)AVP, a V1 receptor antagonist, significantly attenuated the analgesic response to PIFS, it potentiated the analgesic response to BCFS. It should be noted that the form of PIFS employed in the present study was not blocked by naloxone. These results are discussed in terms of multiple forms of pain-inhibitory systems that may utilize collateral inhibition as a means of providing selective activation.
急性暴露于长时间间歇性足部电击(PIFS)或短暂持续性足部电击(BCFS)都会降低大鼠对伤害性刺激的敏感性,但它们的作用机制有所不同。由于肽类血管加压素(VP)与镇痛和应激相关过程有关,本研究考察了用dPTyr(Me)AVP拮抗中枢VP受体是否会改变PIFS或BCFS后的镇痛反应。虽然脑室内注射V1受体拮抗剂dPTyr(Me)AVP可显著减弱对PIFS的镇痛反应,但却增强了对BCFS的镇痛反应。应当指出的是,本研究中使用的PIFS形式不受纳洛酮的阻断。这些结果将根据多种形式的疼痛抑制系统进行讨论,这些系统可能利用侧支抑制作为提供选择性激活的一种手段。