Suppr超能文献

剂量递增的新辅助放化疗联合剂量勾画调强放疗可提高局部晚期食管癌的病理完全缓解率。

Dose escalated neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with dose-painting intensity-modulated radiation therapy and improved pathologic complete response in locally advanced esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Venkat P S, Shridhar R, Naghavi A O, Hoffe S E, Almhanna K, Pimiento J M, Fontaine J-P, Abuodeh Y, Meredith K L, Frakes J M

机构信息

Departments of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.

Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando, Fl, USA.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jul 1;30(7):1-9. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox036.

Abstract

We compared pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, toxicity, and postoperative complications between patients treated preoperatively with 50.4 Gy versus dose escalation with dose-painting intensity-modulated radiation therapy (dp-IMRT) to 56 Gy in locally advanced esophageal cancer. We evaluated esophageal cancer patients treated between 2006 and 2014 with preoperative IMRT chemoradiation to a dose of 50.4 Gy versus 56 Gy. The endpoints were pCR and toxicity. We identified 113 patients (50.4 Gy: n = 40; 56 Gy: n = 73). There were no significant differences in tumor or patient characteristics. Patients treated with 56 Gy demonstrated a higher pCR rate (56.2% vs. 30.0%) and lower pathologic nonresponse rate (4.1% vs. 20.0%) compared to patients treated to 50.4 Gy (P = 0.008). This remained significant on multivariate analysis (OR 3.375 95%CI 1.3-8.8, P = 0.013). Patients treated to 56 Gy also had an improved 3-year locoregional control rate compared to those treated to 50.4 Gy (93.8% vs. 78.5%; P = 0.022). The estimated 3-year freedom from failure was also superior in the 56 Gy arm (73.7% vs. 52.2%; P = 0.051), approaching significance. There were no differences in treatment related grade ≥3 toxicities, hospital admissions, feeding tube, esophageal stent placement, or dilation. There was, however, a statistically significant increase in postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients treated with 56 Gy (30.1% vs. 12.5%; P = 0.036). There was no difference in postoperative 30 or 60 day mortality. Dose escalation to 56 Gy with dp-IMRT is safe and results in significantly higher complete pathologic response rates in esophageal cancer without an increase in treatment-related toxicity. Prospective trials using dp-IMRT are needed to address the role of dose escalation on pCR rate and survival in esophageal cancer.

摘要

我们比较了局部晚期食管癌患者术前接受50.4 Gy放疗与采用剂量调强放疗(dp-IMRT)剂量递增至56 Gy后的病理完全缓解(pCR)率、毒性反应及术后并发症。我们评估了2006年至2014年间接受术前IMRT同步放化疗,剂量为50.4 Gy与56 Gy的食管癌患者。观察终点为pCR和毒性反应。我们纳入了113例患者(50.4 Gy组:n = 40;56 Gy组:n = 73)。肿瘤或患者特征方面无显著差异。与接受50.4 Gy治疗的患者相比,接受56 Gy治疗的患者pCR率更高(56.2% 对30.0%),病理无反应率更低(4.1% 对20.0%)(P = 0.008)。多因素分析显示这一差异仍具有显著性(OR 3.375,95%CI 1.3 - 8.8,P = 0.013)。与接受50.4 Gy治疗的患者相比,接受56 Gy治疗的患者3年局部区域控制率也有所提高(93.8% 对78.5%;P = 0.022)。56 Gy组的估计3年无失败生存率也更高(73.7% 对52.2%;P = 0.051),接近显著性差异。治疗相关的≥3级毒性反应、住院、饲管置入、食管支架置入或扩张方面无差异。然而,接受56 Gy治疗患者的术后房颤发生率有统计学显著增加(30.1% 对12.5%;P = 0.036)。术后30天或60天死亡率无差异。采用dp-IMRT将剂量递增至56 Gy是安全的,且能使食管癌患者的病理完全缓解率显著提高,同时不会增加治疗相关毒性。需要进行前瞻性试验以探讨剂量递增对食管癌pCR率和生存率的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验