Division of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine, University and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Oct 1;73(10):2729-2737. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky254.
We evaluated whether dried blood spots (DBS) are suitable to monitor combined ART when samples are collected in rural Tanzania and transported over a long distance to a specialized bioanalytical laboratory.
Plasma and DBS samples were collected in Tanzania from study patients treated with nevirapine, efavirenz or lopinavir. In addition, plasma, whole blood and DBS samples were obtained from a cohort of HIV patients at the site of the bioanalytical laboratory in Switzerland. DBS samples were analysed using a fully automated LC-MS/MS method.
Comparison of DBS versus plasma concentrations of samples obtained from the bridging study in Switzerland indicated an acceptable bias only for nevirapine (18.4%), whereas for efavirenz and lopinavir a pronounced difference of -47.4% and -48.1% was found, respectively. Adjusting the DBS concentrations by the haematocrit and the fraction of drug bound to plasma proteins removed this bias [efavirenz +9.4% (-6.9% to +25.7%), lopinavir +2.2% (-20.0% to +24.2%)]. Storage and transportation of samples from Tanzania to Switzerland did not affect the good agreement between plasma and DBS for nevirapine [-2.9% (-34.7% to +29.0%)] and efavirenz [-9.6% (-42.9% to +23.8%)]. For lopinavir, however, adjusted DBS concentrations remained considerably below [-32.8% (-70.4% to +4.8%)] corresponding plasma concentrations due to decay of lopinavir in DBS obtained under field conditions.
Our field study shows that the DBS technique is a suitable tool for therapeutic drug monitoring in resource-poor regions; however, sample stability remains an issue for certain analytes and therefore needs special consideration.
我们评估在坦桑尼亚农村采集样本并长途运输至专门的生物分析实验室时,干血斑(DBS)是否适合监测联合抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)。
在坦桑尼亚,从接受奈韦拉平、依非韦伦或洛匹那韦治疗的研究患者中采集血浆和 DBS 样本。此外,从瑞士生物分析实验室现场的一组 HIV 患者中获得血浆、全血和 DBS 样本。使用全自动 LC-MS/MS 方法分析 DBS 样本。
与瑞士桥接研究中获得的血浆样本相比,DBS 样本的浓度比较表明,仅奈韦拉平(18.4%)的偏差可以接受,而对于依非韦伦和洛匹那韦,分别发现明显的差异 -47.4%和-48.1%。通过血细胞比容和与血浆蛋白结合的药物分数调整 DBS 浓度,消除了这种偏差[依非韦伦+9.4%(-6.9%至+25.7%),洛匹那韦+2.2%(-20.0%至+24.2%)]。从坦桑尼亚向瑞士运输和储存样本不会影响奈韦拉平[-2.9%(-34.7%至+29.0%)]和依非韦伦[-9.6%(-42.9%至+23.8%)]血浆和 DBS 之间的良好一致性。然而,对于洛匹那韦,由于野外条件下 DBS 中洛匹那韦的衰减,调整后的 DBS 浓度仍然明显低于[-32.8%(-70.4%至+4.8%)]相应的血浆浓度。
我们的现场研究表明,DBS 技术是资源匮乏地区治疗药物监测的一种合适工具;然而,对于某些分析物,样本稳定性仍然是一个问题,因此需要特别考虑。