Awake Craniotomy in a Low- to Middle-Income Country: A Sustainability Analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the sustainability of teaching awake craniotomy in Indonesia. We explored the factors affecting how awake craniotomy can be taught in a low- to middle-income (LMIC) country and the factors affecting the utilization of awake craniotomy in Indonesia.

METHODS

This is a prospective mixed-methods study in Indonesia. A questionnaire was administered to 100 neurosurgeons at a conference on their experience with neuro-oncology, awake craniotomy, and teaching missions. Thirty-three physicians participated in semi-structured interviews elaborating on these topics. Data on tumor caseload and resources were collected.

RESULTS

Thirty-three of 88 respondents (41.3%) indicated that they still perform awake craniotomy. Although 87.3% felt that it was beneficial for patients and resource sparing, less than a quarter of them felt they had sufficient exposure/training in awake craniotomy. Almost all of them wanted further training and to maintain a relationship with international mentors. Four themes emerged about the factors that affect how we teach awake craniotomy in an LMIC: 1) the sustainability of a teaching mission is dependent on a culture of information sharing and 2) the support of multiple health care providers; 3) hospital structure affects how changes are implemented; and 4) health care professionals in Indonesia value opportunities for international training. Regarding the uptake of awake craniotomy in Indonesia, there are sociocultural factors that affect patients' receptiveness to surgery and the national insurance plan restricts the provision of neurosurgical care.

CONCLUSIONS

Many factors need to be explored when planning a neurosurgical mission in LMICs to ensure its sustainability.