Department of Historical Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, C-Ring 2 - Orange, Block (Kingsway Campus), Corner Kingsway and University Road, Auckland Park, South Africa; School of Humanities and Communication Arts, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Department of Historical Studies, University of Cape Town, Beattie Building, University Avenue, Upper Campus, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa.
J Environ Manage. 2019 Jan 1;229:174-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.029. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
This article offers a historical framework for understanding changes to human perceptions and efforts to manage invasive alien plants and weeds in South Africa from the mid-nineteenth century until the present. The article argues that South African legislation and policy for managing invasive alien plants and weeds has historically been limited because people have held contradictory values about plants, many private land owners have lacked resources and have not been compelled to follow government legislation and because policy has reflected the interests of a small group of farmers or scientific experts who have had limited influence on most private land owners and traditional land users. Successful control efforts often relied on technical expertise that was applied controversially or could be implemented on government land without extensive public consultation or social conflict. The creation of a national framework for invasive alien plants through the Working for Water Programme in 1995 and National Environmental Management of Biodiversity Act (no. 10) of 2004 (NEMBA) has increased public awareness, but the Programme and NEMBA remain limited by many of the same institutional and social constraints that experts and institutions faced in the past. In conclusion, the article draws on history to provide insights to contemporary challenges.
本文提供了一个历史框架,以帮助理解南非从 19 世纪中叶至今人类对入侵外来植物和杂草的认知变化,以及对其管理所做出的努力。文章指出,南非在入侵外来植物和杂草管理方面的立法和政策在历史上一直受到限制,因为人们对植物持有矛盾的价值观,许多私人土地所有者缺乏资源,也没有被强制遵守政府的立法,而且政策反映了一小部分农民或科学专家的利益,而这些人对大多数私人土地所有者和传统土地使用者的影响有限。成功的控制措施往往依赖于有争议的技术专业知识,或者可以在没有广泛公众咨询或社会冲突的情况下在政府土地上实施。1995 年通过“为水而战”计划(Working for Water Programme)和 2004 年的《国家生物多样性环境管理法》(National Environmental Management of Biodiversity Act (no. 10))创建了入侵外来植物国家框架,提高了公众意识,但该计划和该法案仍然受到过去专家和机构所面临的许多相同制度和社会限制的限制。总之,本文通过历史借鉴为当代挑战提供了一些见解。