Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, AMC Heart Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia.
Open Heart. 2018 Jul 17;5(2):e000801. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000801. eCollection 2018.
To measure medium-term outcomes and determine the predictors of mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) both during and after hospitalisation in a resource-limited South-East Asian setting.
From February 2013 to December 2014, we conducted a prospective observational cohort study of 477 patients admitted to Makassar Cardiac Center, Indonesia, with acute coronary syndrome and stable CAD. We actively obtained data on clinical outcomes and after-discharge management until April 2017. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to examine predictors for our primary outcome, all-cause mortality.
From hospital admission, patients were followed over a median of 18 (IQR 6-36) months; in total 154 (32.3%) patients died. More patients with acute myocardial infarction died in the hospital compared with patients with unstable and stable angina (p=0.002). Over the total follow-up, there was a difference in mortality between non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n=41, 48.2%), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n=65, 30.8%), unstable angina (n=18, 26.5%) and stable coronary artery disease (n=30, 26.5%) groups (p=0.007). The independent predictors of all-cause mortality were hyperglycaemia on admission (HR 1.55 (95% CI 1.12 to 2.14), p=0.008), heart failure/Killip class ≥2 (HR 2.50 (95% CI 1.76 to 3.56), p<0.001), estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min (HR 1.77 (95% CI 1.26 to 2.50), p=0.001), no revascularisation (percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass grafting) (HR 2.38 (95% CI 1.31 to 4.33), p=0.005) and poor adherence to after-discharge medications (HR 10.28 (95% CI 5.52 to 19.16), p<0.001). Poor medication adherence predicted postdischarge mortality and did so irrespective of underlying CAD diagnosis (p interaction=0.88).
Patients with CAD in a poor South-East Asian setting experience high in-hospital and medium-term mortality. The initial severity of the disease, lack of access to guidelines-recommended therapy and poor adherence to after-discharge medications are the main drivers for excess mortality. Improved access to early and late hospital care and patient education should be prioritised for better survival.
在资源有限的东南亚环境中,测量患有冠心病(CAD)患者在住院期间和出院后的中期结果,并确定死亡率的预测因素。
从 2013 年 2 月至 2014 年 12 月,我们对 477 名因急性冠状动脉综合征和稳定型 CAD 入住印度尼西亚望加锡心脏中心的患者进行了前瞻性观察队列研究。我们积极获取了直至 2017 年 4 月的临床结果和出院后管理数据。采用多变量 Cox 比例风险分析来检查我们的主要结局(全因死亡率)的预测因素。
从住院开始,患者的中位随访时间为 18 个月(IQR 6-36);总共有 154 名(32.3%)患者死亡。与不稳定型心绞痛和稳定型心绞痛患者相比,急性心肌梗死患者的住院死亡率更高(p=0.002)。在总随访期间,非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(n=41,48.2%)、ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(n=65,30.8%)、不稳定型心绞痛(n=18,26.5%)和稳定型冠状动脉疾病(n=30,26.5%)组之间的死亡率存在差异(p=0.007)。全因死亡率的独立预测因素包括入院时的高血糖(HR 1.55(95%CI 1.12 至 2.14),p=0.008)、心力衰竭/ Killip 分级≥2(HR 2.50(95%CI 1.76 至 3.56),p<0.001)、估算肾小球滤过率<60mL/min(HR 1.77(95%CI 1.26 至 2.50),p=0.001)、未进行血运重建(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗/冠状动脉旁路移植术)(HR 2.38(95%CI 1.31 至 4.33),p=0.005)和出院后药物治疗依从性差(HR 10.28(95%CI 5.52 至 19.16),p<0.001)。较差的药物治疗依从性预测了出院后的死亡率,而且无论基础 CAD 诊断如何(p 交互=0.88),均如此。
在东南亚贫困地区,CAD 患者的住院期间和中期死亡率较高。疾病初始严重程度、无法获得指南推荐的治疗以及对出院后药物治疗的依从性差是导致死亡率过高的主要原因。为了提高生存率,应优先考虑改善早期和晚期医院护理和患者教育。