• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰导管原位癌的治疗模式和结局。

Patterns of treatment and outcome of ductal carcinoma in situ in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Research Institute GROW, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 May;187(1):245-254. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06055-w. Epub 2021 Jan 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-020-06055-w
PMID:33385265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8062340/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To spare DCIS patients from overtreatment, treatment de-escalated over the years. This study evaluates the influence of these developments on the patterns of care in the treatment of DCIS with particular interest in the use of breast conserving surgery (BCS), radiotherapy following BCS and the use and type of axillary staging.

METHODS

In this large population-based cohort study all women, aged 50-74 years diagnosed with DCIS from January 1989 until January 2019, were analyzed per two-year cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 30,417 women were diagnosed with DCIS. The proportion of patients undergoing BCS increased from 47.7% in 1995-1996 to 72.7% in 2017-2018 (p < 0.001). Adjuvant radiotherapy following BCS increased from 28.9% (1995-1996) to 89.6% (2011-2012) and subsequently decreased to 74.9% (2017-2018; p < 0.001). Since its introduction, the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) increased to 63.1% in 2013-2014 and subsequently decreased to 52.8% in 2017-2018 (p < 0.001). Axillary surgery is already omitted in 55.8% of the patients undergoing BCS nowadays. The five-year invasive relapse-free survival (iRFS) for BCS with adjuvant radiotherapy in the period 1989-2010, was 98.7% [CI 98.4% - 99.0%], compared to 95.0% [CI 94.1% -95.8%] for BCS only (p < 0.001). In 2011-2018, this was 99.3% [CI 99.1% - 99.5%] and 98.8% [CI 98.2% - 99.4%] respectively (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a shift toward less extensive treatment. DCIS is increasingly treated with BCS and less often followed by additional radiotherapy. The absence of radiotherapy still results in excellent iRFS. Axillary surgery is increasingly omitted in DCIS patients.

摘要

目的

为了避免 DCIS 患者过度治疗,多年来治疗已经有所缓和。本研究评估了这些发展对 DCIS 治疗模式的影响,特别关注保乳手术(BCS)的使用、BCS 后的放疗以及腋窝分期的使用和类型。

方法

在这项基于人群的大型队列研究中,所有年龄在 50-74 岁之间的 1989 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月期间被诊断为 DCIS 的女性均按每两年一组进行分析。

结果

共有 30417 名女性被诊断为 DCIS。接受 BCS 的患者比例从 1995-1996 年的 47.7%增加到 2017-2018 年的 72.7%(p<0.001)。BCS 后的辅助放疗从 28.9%(1995-1996 年)增加到 89.6%(2011-2012 年),随后下降到 74.9%(2017-2018 年;p<0.001)。自引入以来,前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的使用率从 2013-2014 年的 63.1%增加到 2017-2018 年的 52.8%(p<0.001)。目前,接受 BCS 的患者中有 55.8%已经省略了腋窝手术。在 1989-2010 年期间,接受辅助放疗的 BCS 的五年无侵袭性复发存活率(iRFS)为 98.7%[98.4%-99.0%],而仅接受 BCS 的为 95.0%[94.1%-95.8%](p<0.001)。在 2011-2018 年期间,这分别为 99.3%[99.1%-99.5%]和 98.8%[98.2%-99.4%](p=0.01)。

结论

本研究表明治疗方式向非广泛治疗转变。DCIS 越来越多地采用 BCS 治疗,且后续追加放疗的情况越来越少。不进行放疗仍能产生极好的 iRFS。在 DCIS 患者中,腋窝手术越来越多地被省略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d4c/8062340/8a71c7c5242d/10549_2020_6055_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d4c/8062340/42897fc96135/10549_2020_6055_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d4c/8062340/05130b611b4a/10549_2020_6055_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d4c/8062340/716d1ffaa76f/10549_2020_6055_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d4c/8062340/e2df59a2b78b/10549_2020_6055_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d4c/8062340/d7e45942257c/10549_2020_6055_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d4c/8062340/8a71c7c5242d/10549_2020_6055_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d4c/8062340/42897fc96135/10549_2020_6055_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d4c/8062340/05130b611b4a/10549_2020_6055_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d4c/8062340/716d1ffaa76f/10549_2020_6055_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d4c/8062340/e2df59a2b78b/10549_2020_6055_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d4c/8062340/d7e45942257c/10549_2020_6055_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d4c/8062340/8a71c7c5242d/10549_2020_6055_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patterns of treatment and outcome of ductal carcinoma in situ in the Netherlands.荷兰导管原位癌的治疗模式和结局。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 May;187(1):245-254. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06055-w. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
2
The Influence of Hospital and Surgeon Factors on the Prevalence of Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.医院和外科医生因素对导管原位癌腋窝淋巴结评估流行率的影响。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):323-32. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0389.
3
Can we select individuals with low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)? A population-based outcomes analysis.能否筛选出低风险导管原位癌(DCIS)患者?基于人群的结局分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(2):581-90. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2455-8. Epub 2013 Mar 3.
4
Multiple foci of microinvasion is associated with an increased risk of invasive local recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery.多灶微浸润与保乳手术后导管原位癌女性浸润性局部复发风险增加相关。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Nov;178(1):169-176. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05364-z. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
5
Patterns of invasive recurrence among patients originally treated for ductal carcinoma in situ by breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy.保乳手术与乳房切除术治疗导管原位癌患者的浸润性复发模式。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;186(3):617-624. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06129-3. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
6
Invasive recurrence after breast conserving treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the Netherlands: time trends and the association with tumour grade.荷兰保乳治疗乳腺导管原位癌的侵袭性复发:时间趋势及与肿瘤分级的关系。
Br J Cancer. 2024 Sep;131(5):852-859. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02785-6. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
7
Time trends and inter-hospital variation in treatment and axillary staging of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the era of screening in Southern Netherlands.荷兰南部筛查时代乳腺导管原位癌患者的治疗和腋窝分期的时间趋势和医院间差异。
Breast. 2014 Feb;23(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
8
Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes.乳腺导管原位癌:发病率、治疗和结局的系统评价。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):170-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp482. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
9
Subsequent risk of ipsilateral and contralateral invasive breast cancer after treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: incidence and the effect of radiotherapy in a population-based cohort of 10,090 women.导管原位癌治疗后同侧和对侧浸润性乳腺癌的后续风险:10,090名女性人群队列中的发病率及放疗效果
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Oct;159(3):553-63. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3973-y. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
10
Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be omitted in DCIS patients treated with breast conserving therapy.对于接受保乳治疗的导管原位癌(DCIS)患者,可以省略前哨淋巴结活检。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Apr;156(3):517-525. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3783-2. Epub 2016 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence trends of ductal carcinoma in situ in New Zealand women between 1999 and 2022.1999年至2022年间新西兰女性原位导管癌的发病趋势。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Apr;210(2):439-449. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07582-6. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
2
An early economic evaluation of active surveillance for low-risk ductal carcinoma .低风险导管癌主动监测的早期经济学评估
Future Oncol. 2024 Dec;20(40):3451-3462. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2421152. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
3
Invasive recurrence after breast conserving treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the Netherlands: time trends and the association with tumour grade.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Local Recurrence Risk Estimates After Breast-Conserving Surgery for DCIS: DCIS Nomogram Versus Refined Oncotype DX Breast DCIS Score.保乳手术后 DCIS 局部复发风险估计的比较:DCIS 列线图与改良的 Oncotype DX 乳腺 DCIS 评分。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3282-3288. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07537-y. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
2
Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.早期乳腺癌:ESMO 临床实践指南之诊断、治疗及随访
Ann Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;30(10):1674. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz189.
3
Molecular Evaluation of Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Oncotype DX DCIS.
荷兰保乳治疗乳腺导管原位癌的侵袭性复发:时间趋势及与肿瘤分级的关系。
Br J Cancer. 2024 Sep;131(5):852-859. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02785-6. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Adherence to guideline recommendations for follow-up in patients with DCIS at a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands.荷兰一家大型教学医院中,对 DCIS 患者进行随访的指南推荐的坚持情况。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Oct;207(3):633-640. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07391-x. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
5
Contemporary Analysis of Reexcision and Conversion to Mastectomy Rates and Associated Healthcare Costs for Women Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery.保乳手术后再次切除术和改行乳房切除术的比率及相关医疗保健费用的当代分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3649-3660. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-14902-z. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
6
The effects of contemporary treatment of DCIS on the risk of developing an ipsilateral invasive Breast cancer (iIBC) in the Dutch population.当代治疗 DCIS 对荷兰人群同侧浸润性乳腺癌 (iIBC) 发病风险的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Feb;204(1):61-68. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07168-8. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
Oncotype DX DCIS 对乳腺导管原位癌的分子评估。
Am J Pathol. 2019 May;189(5):975-980. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
4
Significant inter- and intra-laboratory variation in grading of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a nationwide study of 4901 patients in the Netherlands.荷兰全国范围内对 4901 例乳腺导管原位癌患者的研究显示,导管原位癌分级存在显著的实验室间和实验室内差异。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(2):479-488. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-05082-y. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
5
Risk factors of sentinel and non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: A nationwide study.乳腺导管原位癌患者前哨淋巴结和非前哨淋巴结转移的危险因素:一项全国性研究。
Breast. 2018 Dec;42:128-132. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
6
Breast cancer-related deaths according to grade in ductal carcinoma in situ: A Dutch population-based study on patients diagnosed between 1999 and 2012.基于人群的研究:1999 年至 2012 年间诊断为导管原位癌的患者,根据分级的乳腺癌相关死亡。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Sep;101:134-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 28.
7
Refined estimates of local recurrence risks by DCIS score adjusting for clinicopathological features: a combined analysis of ECOG-ACRIN E5194 and Ontario DCIS cohort studies.通过调整临床病理特征的 DCIS 评分来精确估计局部复发风险:ECOG-ACRIN E5194 和安大略 DCIS 队列研究的联合分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jun;169(2):359-369. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4693-2. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
Gene Expression Differences between Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with and without Progression to Invasive Breast Cancer.伴有或不伴有进展为浸润性乳腺癌的导管原位癌之间的基因表达差异
Am J Pathol. 2017 Jul;187(7):1648-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.03.012.
9
Cause-specific Mortality in a Population-based Cohort of 9799 Women Treated for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.基于人群的 9799 例导管原位癌治疗女性队列的病因特异性死亡率。
Ann Surg. 2018 May;267(5):952-958. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002239.
10
Estimating the Risks of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: Evidence From Modern Radiation Doses to the Lungs and Heart and From Previous Randomized Trials.评估乳腺癌放疗风险:来自肺部和心脏现代辐射剂量及既往随机试验的证据
J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 20;35(15):1641-1649. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0722. Epub 2017 Mar 20.