• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国女性生殖器官割礼的预防:可以采取哪些措施?

The prevention of female genital mutilation in England: what can be done?

机构信息

Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK.

Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Sep 30;41(3):e261-e266. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy128.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdy128
PMID:30060003
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a global public health issue. Women in the UK are at risk of FGM and its adverse health consequences but little is known about its practice. Since 1985 it has been a criminal offence to perform FGM in the UK and further legislation has tightened the law but FGM continues.

METHODS

Four community researchers from the Kenyan, Nigerian, Somalian and Sudanese communities in Oxford conducted focus groups and interviews with 53 people to understand the communities' beliefs about how best to prevent FGM.

RESULTS

Participants believed that the current UK legislation alone was not sufficient to tackle FGM and might in fact be counterproductive by alienating communities through its perceived imposition. They felt that there had been insufficient consultation with affected communities, awareness raising and education about the legislation. Community-led solutions were the most effective way to tackle FGM.

CONCLUSIONS

FGM adversely affects communities globally. In the UK, researchers from affected communities gathered data demonstrating the feasibility and importance of involving communities in FGM prevention work. Further research is needed to understand how best to prevent FGM in affected communities and, very importantly, to examine the impact of the UK legislation relating to FGM.

摘要

背景

女性生殖器切割(FGM)是一个全球性的公共卫生问题。英国的女性面临着 FGM 及其不良健康后果的风险,但人们对其做法知之甚少。自 1985 年以来,在英国实施 FGM 已构成刑事犯罪,而且进一步的立法已经收紧了法律,但 FGM 仍在继续。

方法

来自牛津的肯尼亚、尼日利亚、索马里和苏丹社区的四名社区研究人员进行了焦点小组和访谈,共 53 人参与,以了解社区对如何最好地预防 FGM 的看法。

结果

参与者认为,仅靠英国现行立法不足以解决 FGM 问题,实际上可能会通过其被视为强加的方式疏远社区,反而产生反效果。他们认为,在立法方面,与受影响社区的磋商、提高认识和教育还不够充分。社区主导的解决方案是解决 FGM 的最有效途径。

结论

FGM 对全球社区产生不利影响。在英国,来自受影响社区的研究人员收集的数据表明,让社区参与 FGM 预防工作是可行且重要的。需要进一步研究如何在受影响社区中最好地预防 FGM,并且非常重要的是,要研究与英国 FGM 立法相关的影响。

相似文献

1
The prevention of female genital mutilation in England: what can be done?英国女性生殖器官割礼的预防:可以采取哪些措施?
J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Sep 30;41(3):e261-e266. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy128.
2
Exploring young people's interpretations of female genital mutilation in the UK using a community-based participatory research approach.采用社区参与式研究方法探索英国年轻人对女性割礼的理解。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):1132. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09183-6.
3
An exploration of attitudes towards female genital mutilation (FGM) in men and women accessing FGM clinical services in London: a pilot study.对伦敦接受女性生殖器切割临床服务的男性和女性对女性生殖器切割态度的探索:一项试点研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Oct;38(7):1005-1009. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1437718. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
4
A qualitative assessment of women's perspectives and experience of female genital mutilation in Iraqi Kurdistan Region.对伊拉克库尔德斯坦地区女性割礼的女性观点和经验的定性评估。
BMC Womens Health. 2019 May 16;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0765-7.
5
Qualitative evaluation of the Saleema campaign to eliminate female genital mutilation and cutting in Sudan.定性评估在苏丹开展的消除女性外阴残割和切割Saleema 运动。
Reprod Health. 2018 Feb 17;15(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0470-2.
6
The limited effectiveness of legislation against female genital mutilation and the role of community beliefs in Upper East Region, Ghana.加纳上东部地区反对女性生殖器切割立法的有限成效及社区信仰的作用。
Reprod Health Matters. 2009 Nov;17(34):47-54. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(09)34474-2.
7
Female genital mutilation/cutting: Emerging factors sustaining medicalization related changes in selected Kenyan communities.女性生殖器切割/切割:肯尼亚部分社区中维持与医学化相关变化的新兴因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0228410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228410. eCollection 2020.
8
A qualitative study examining UK female genital mutilation health campaigns from the perspective of affected communities.一项从受影响社区角度考察英国女性外阴残割健康运动的定性研究。
Public Health. 2020 Oct;187:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.07.038. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Preventing female genital mutilation in high income countries: a systematic review of the evidence.高收入国家预防女性生殖器官切割:证据的系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jul 22;16(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0774-x.
10
Beyond will: the empowerment conditions needed to abandon female genital mutilation in Conakry (Guinea), a focused ethnography.超越意志:在科纳克里(几内亚)放弃女性割礼所需的赋权条件,一项聚焦民族志研究。
Reprod Health. 2020 May 6;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00910-1.

引用本文的文献

1
What interventions are effective to prevent or respond to female genital mutilation? A review of existing evidence from 2008-2020.哪些干预措施对于预防或应对女性生殖器切割有效?对2008年至2020年现有证据的综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 May 16;3(5):e0001855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001855. eCollection 2023.
2
Female Genital Mutilation Consequences and Healthcare Received among Migrant Women: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study.女性外阴残割后果和移民妇女获得的医疗保健:一项现象学定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 5;18(13):7195. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137195.
3
Healthy, safe and responsible: the modern female traveller.
健康、安全且有责任感:现代女性旅行者。
Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2021 Jun 5;7(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40794-021-00141-7.
4
Conversations about FGM in primary care: a realist review on how, why and under what circumstances FGM is discussed in general practice consultations.基层医疗保健中的女性生殖器官切割问题对话:关于一般医疗咨询中讨论女性生殖器官切割的方式、原因和在何种情况下进行讨论的真实情况综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e039809. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039809.
5
Supporting patients with female genital mutilation in primary care: a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of GPs' working in England.支持在初级保健中接受女性生殖器官切割的患者:一项探索在英格兰工作的全科医生观点的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Oct 1;70(699):e749-e756. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712637. Print 2020 Oct.
6
Estimating utility value for female genital mutilation.估计女性生殖器切割的效用值。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 29;20(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08947-4.
7
Seeking culturally safe care: a qualitative systematic review of the healthcare experiences of women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting.寻求文化安全的护理:对经历女性生殖器切割的妇女和女孩的医疗保健体验的定性系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 29;9(5):e027452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027452.
8
Female genital mutilation: barriers to accessing care.女性生殖器切割:获得护理的障碍。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 4;364:l921. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l921.