Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Aylesbury Campus, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, UK.
Centre for Public Health and Wellbeing, The University of the West of England (UWE, Bristol), Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, United Kingdom.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):1132. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09183-6.
Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a deeply-rooted cultural practice mainly undertaken in Africa, the Middle East and Asian countries. Evidence to date suggests that although first-generation migrants to the West are abandoning FGM, the custom continues in some places, albeit in small numbers. This study examined how young people living in FGM affected communities in the United Kingdom (UK), interpreted and explained FGM.
A community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach was used to recruit and train nine young people aged 15-18 as co-researchers. These comprised eight females and one male from second-generation FGM affected communities, living in Bristol. The co-researchers then undertook focus groups and semi-structured interviews with twenty participants aged 13-15 living in Bristol, Cardiff and Milton Keynes. The qualitative data from the training workshops, interviews and focus groups were collected and analysed using thematic analysis.
There were conflicting views among participants. Some perceived FGM as a historical tradition that was of very little, if any, relevance to them. In contrast, others perceived that the more archaic, cultural interpretation of FGM, more commonly shared by older generations, had been supplanted by a new form of FGM, which they believed to be a safe procedure, made so by the availability of highly-trained, qualified doctors and better equipment in the UK. Participants spoke of challenges encountered when attempting to raise the issue of FGM with parents. Nevertheless, they acknowledged that- being born and raised in the UK - enabled them to talk openly and to challenge others.
Future strategies to address and prevent FGM in the UK will require a public health approach that is holistic, intersectional and empowering. Such measures should be relevant to young people born and raised in the UK who interpret FGM differently to previous first-generation migrant relatives and communities. Tackling FGM requires a shift away from a principal preoccupation with harm reduction and criminalisation towards collaboration and active dialogue with communities, in positive and productive ways that acknowledge and engage issues of identity, race, gender, and generation, enabling people affected by FGM to take control of their health and well-being.
女性生殖器切割(FGM)是一种根深蒂固的文化习俗,主要在非洲、中东和亚洲国家实施。迄今为止的证据表明,尽管第一代移民到西方的人已经放弃了女性生殖器切割,但在某些地方,尽管人数很少,但这种习俗仍在继续。本研究调查了生活在实施女性生殖器切割习俗影响社区的英国(UK)年轻人如何解释和解释女性生殖器切割。
采用基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)方法招募并培训了 9 名年龄在 15-18 岁的年轻人作为共同研究者。这些共同研究者来自 Bristol 的第二代受女性生殖器切割影响的社区,包括 8 名女性和 1 名男性。然后,这些共同研究者对居住在 Bristol、Cardiff 和 Milton Keynes 的 20 名年龄在 13-15 岁的参与者进行了焦点小组和半结构化访谈。从培训研讨会、访谈和焦点小组中收集了定性数据,并使用主题分析进行了分析。
参与者之间存在意见分歧。一些人认为女性生殖器切割是一种历史传统,与他们几乎没有任何关系。相比之下,其他人则认为,老一辈人更普遍持有的女性生殖器切割的更古老的文化解释已经被他们认为是安全程序的新形式所取代,在英国,高度训练有素的合格医生和更好的设备使得这种形式成为可能。参与者谈到了在试图与父母讨论女性生殖器切割问题时遇到的挑战。然而,他们承认,由于他们在英国出生和长大,因此能够坦诚相待并挑战他人。
未来在英国解决和预防女性生殖器切割的策略将需要采取整体、交叉和赋权的公共卫生方法。这些措施应该与在英国出生和长大的年轻人相关,他们对女性生殖器切割的解释与第一代移民亲属和社区不同。解决女性生殖器切割问题需要从主要关注减少伤害和刑事化转向与社区合作并进行积极和富有成效的对话,承认并处理身份、种族、性别和代际问题,使受女性生殖器切割影响的人能够掌控自己的健康和福祉。