Suppr超能文献

降尿酸治疗与痛风患者全关节置换的风险。

Urate-lowering treatment and risk of total joint replacement in patients with gout.

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology and Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Dec 1;57(12):2129-2139. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key212.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether gout is an independent risk factor for total joint replacement (TJR) and whether urate-lowering treatment (ULT) reduces this risk.

METHODS

Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance database and the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, 74 560 Taiwan patients and 34 505 UK patients with incident gout were identified and age and sex matched to people without gout. Cox proportional hazards models and condition logistic regression were used to examine the risk of TJR in gout patients and the association between cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) of ULT and TJR.

RESULTS

The prevalence rates of TJR in the patients at the time of diagnosis of gout and in people without gout were 1.16% vs 0.82% in Taiwan and 2.61% vs 1.76% in the UK. After a gout diagnosis, the incidence of TJR was higher in the patients with gout compared with those without (3.23 vs 1.91 cases/1000 person-years in Taiwan and 6.87 vs 4.61 cases/1000 person-years in the UK), with adjusted HRs of 1.56 (95% CI 1.45, 1.68) in Taiwan and 1.14 (1.05, 1.22) in the UK. Compared with patients with gout with <28 cDDD ULT, the adjusted ORs for TJR were 0.89 (95% CI 0.77, 1.03) for 28-90 cDDD, 1.03 (0.85, 1.24) for 90-180 cDDD and 1.12 (0.94, 1.34) for >180 cDDD ULT in Taiwan. In the UK, the respective ORs were 1.09 (0.83, 1.42), 0.93 (0.68, 1.27) and 1.08 (0.94, 1.24).

CONCLUSION

This population-based study provides evidence from two nation populations that gout confers significant TJR risk, which was not reduced by current ULT.

摘要

目的

探讨痛风是否为全关节置换术(TJR)的独立危险因素,以及降尿酸治疗(ULT)是否降低了这种风险。

方法

本研究使用了来自中国台湾地区全民健康保险数据库和英国临床实践研究数据链接的资料,共纳入了 74560 例台湾地区和 34505 例英国地区的初诊痛风患者,并按年龄和性别与无痛风患者进行匹配。采用 Cox 比例风险模型和条件逻辑回归分析来评估痛风患者接受 TJR 的风险,以及 ULT 的累积规定日剂量(cDDD)与 TJR 之间的相关性。

结果

在确诊痛风时,患者和无痛风人群的 TJR 患病率分别为 1.16%和 0.82%(中国台湾地区)和 2.61%和 1.76%(英国)。与无痛风患者相比,痛风患者在确诊后 TJR 的发生率更高(中国台湾地区为 3.23 例/1000 人年,英国为 6.87 例/1000 人年),校正后的风险比(HR)分别为 1.56(95%可信区间[CI]:1.45,1.68)和 1.14(1.05,1.22)。与接受 ULT 治疗的<28 cDDD 的痛风患者相比,28-90 cDDD、90-180 cDDD 和>180 cDDD ULT 的校正优势比(OR)分别为 0.89(95% CI:0.77,1.03)、1.03(0.85,1.24)和 1.12(0.94,1.34)(中国台湾地区);在英国,相应的 OR 分别为 1.09(0.83,1.42)、0.93(0.68,1.27)和 1.08(0.94,1.24)。

结论

这项基于人群的研究提供了来自两个国家人群的证据,表明痛风会显著增加 TJR 风险,而目前的 ULT 并不能降低这种风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ab1/6256332/b28f9c7190ee/key212f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验