Zafar Kamran, Patil Nirav
Tex Heart Inst J. 2018 Jun 1;45(3):136-143. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-16-5943. eCollection 2018 Jun.
The clinical characteristics and outcomes among patients with inpatient-onset non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome have not been fully investigated. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of patients who were ≥18 years old and diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome at our hospital during 2014. We performed logistic regression analysis to evaluate outcomes and made adjustments for age, race, family history of premature coronary artery disease, and comorbidities. Our search through 31,274 hospital discharge records identified 683 cases of acute coronary syndrome: 32 were inpatient-onset and 651 were outpatient-onset. The inpatient-onset group was older (74.6 ± 9.6 vs 64 ± 12.8 yr; <0.001), and patients were more likely to be black (28.1% vs 12.9%). Diagnoses at admission in the inpatient-onset group varied widely, including 4 cases of pneumonia and 3 of intestinal obstruction. The inpatient-onset group was less likely than the outpatient-onset group to undergo cardiac catheterization (34.4% vs 90.2%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.11; 95% CI, 0.05-0.28; <0.001) or percutaneous coronary intervention (12.5% vs 61.6%; AOR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05-0.48; =0.001), or to be discharged from the hospital (53.1% vs 88.9%; AOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11-0.6; =0.002). The inpatient-onset ACS group had longer hospital stays than did the outpatient-onset group (9.9 ± 8.9 vs 6.4 ± 5.2 d; =0.03). We found that inpatient-onset acute coronary syndrome was associated with less interventional management, a longer hospital stay, and a lower likelihood of discharge to home.
住院起病的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床特征和预后尚未得到充分研究。因此,我们对2014年在我院诊断为急性冠状动脉综合征且年龄≥18岁的患者进行了一项回顾性单中心分析。我们进行了逻辑回归分析以评估预后,并对年龄、种族、早发冠状动脉疾病家族史和合并症进行了校正。通过对31274份医院出院记录的检索,我们确定了683例急性冠状动脉综合征病例:32例为住院起病,651例为门诊起病。住院起病组患者年龄更大(74.6±9.6岁 vs 64±12.8岁;P<0.001),且更可能为黑人(28.1% vs 12.9%)。住院起病组入院时的诊断差异很大,包括4例肺炎和3例肠梗阻。住院起病组接受心脏导管检查(34.4% vs 90.2%;校正比值比[AOR],0.11;95%可信区间[CI],0.05 - 0.28;P<0.001)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(12.5% vs 61.6%;AOR,0.16;95%CI,0.05 - 0.48;P = 0.001)或出院(53.1% vs 88.9%;AOR,0.26;95%CI,0.11 - 0.6;P = 0.002)的可能性均低于门诊起病组。住院起病的急性冠状动脉综合征组的住院时间比门诊起病组更长(9.9±8.9天 vs 6.4±5.2天;P = 0.03)。我们发现,住院起病的急性冠状动脉综合征与介入治疗较少、住院时间较长以及出院回家的可能性较低有关。