• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将社会参与工具整合到澳大利亚社区老年护理评估中,以加强服务提供。

Integrating social engagement instruments into Australian community aged care assessments to enhance service provision.

机构信息

Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Uniting, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Nov;26(6):810-818. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12591. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.12591
PMID:30074657
Abstract

Rich social relationships contribute to improved well-being and health outcomes, yet aged care client assessments tend to focus almost exclusively on physical issues. We aim to explore the experiences of aged care staff following their use of social engagement and well-being instruments as part of routine assessments for home-care clients. The social engagement (Australian Community Participation Questionnaire, ACPQ) and well-being (ICEpop CAPability Measure for Older Adults, ICECAP-O) instruments were embedded into the centralised information system of an Australian aged care provider. Staff administered these instruments during routine client assessments across a 9-month period involving 289 assessments. Semistructured interviews with 12 staff members were conducted and themes explored using qualitative content analysis. Key factors related to the acceptability of instrument adoption were found. Staff reported the instruments were convenient to use and were valuable in eliciting information for care plan development. Staff found that the instruments complemented their standard assessment procedures and did not disrupt their routine workload. They emphasised that the information gained greatly assisted their discussions with clients, identified social needs, and enhanced client involvement in decisions about desired services. There were also some challenging elements, including staff concerns regarding their ability to deal with emotional responses from clients evoked by the survey questions. ACPQ and ICECAP-O are useful tools for identifying psychosocial client needs, are feasible for use by large-scale aged care organisations and provide valuable information to guide decision-making about services. Future research should identify the long-term effects on improving social participation and client outcomes.

摘要

丰富的社会关系有助于提高幸福感和健康状况,但老年护理客户评估往往几乎完全集中在身体问题上。我们旨在探讨老年护理人员在使用社会参与和幸福感工具作为家庭护理客户常规评估的一部分后的经验。社会参与(澳大利亚社区参与问卷,ACPQ)和幸福感(ICEpop 老年人能力衡量标准,ICECAP-O)工具被嵌入到澳大利亚老年护理提供商的集中信息系统中。在涉及 289 次评估的 9 个月期间,工作人员在常规客户评估期间管理这些工具。对 12 名工作人员进行了半结构化访谈,并使用定性内容分析探讨了主题。发现了与仪器采用的可接受性相关的关键因素。工作人员报告说,这些仪器使用方便,对于为护理计划制定收集信息非常有价值。工作人员发现,这些仪器补充了他们的标准评估程序,并且不会干扰他们的日常工作量。他们强调,获得的信息极大地帮助了他们与客户的讨论,确定了社会需求,并增强了客户对所需服务的决策参与度。也存在一些具有挑战性的因素,包括工作人员对自己处理调查问题引起的客户情绪反应的能力的担忧。ACPQ 和 ICECAP-O 是识别客户心理社会需求的有用工具,适用于大型老年护理组织使用,并提供有价值的信息来指导服务决策。未来的研究应确定改善社会参与和客户结果的长期影响。

相似文献

1
Integrating social engagement instruments into Australian community aged care assessments to enhance service provision.将社会参与工具整合到澳大利亚社区老年护理评估中,以加强服务提供。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Nov;26(6):810-818. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12591. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
2
Ageing well: evaluation of social participation and quality of life tools to enhance community aged care (study protocol).健康老龄化:评估社会参与和生活质量工具以加强社区老年护理(研究方案)。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1094-2.
3
Development of two measures of client engagement for use in home aged care.开发两种用于居家老年护理的客户参与度测量方法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2016 May;24(3):363-74. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12213. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
4
The Lifestyle Engagement Activity Program (LEAP): Implementing Social and Recreational Activity into Case-Managed Home Care.生活方式参与活动计划(LEAP):将社交和娱乐活动融入个案管理的家庭护理中。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Dec;16(12):1069-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
5
The relative effects of home care client characteristics on the resource allocation process: do personality and demeanor matter?家庭护理客户特征对资源分配过程的相对影响:个性和行为举止重要吗?
Gerontologist. 2002 Dec;42(6):740-50. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.6.740.
6
Developing and testing instruments to measure client outcomes at the Comox Valley Nursing Center.在科莫克斯谷护理中心开发并测试用于衡量客户成果的工具。
Public Health Nurs. 2001 Sep-Oct;18(5):327-39. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2001.00327.x.
7
Feasibility of a rural palliative supportive service.农村姑息支持服务的可行性
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):3116. Epub 2015 May 4.
8
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
9
Participation and power in care: exploring the "client" in client engagement.护理中的参与和权力:探索客户参与中的“客户”
J Aging Stud. 2014 Dec;31:119-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 4.
10
Observational cohort study investigating cognitive outcomes, social networks and well-being in older adults: a study protocol.观察性队列研究调查老年人的认知结果、社交网络和幸福感:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 16;9(6):e029495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029495.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements and Innovation Trends of Information Technology Empowering Elderly Care Community Services Based on CiteSpace and VOSViewer.基于CiteSpace和VOSViewer的信息技术赋能老年护理社区服务的进展与创新趋势
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;13(13):1628. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131628.
2
Routine Quality-of-Life Measurement in Residential Aged Care: Staff, Resident, and Family Perspectives.老年护理机构中生活质量的常规测量:工作人员、居民及家属的观点
Patient. 2025 May;18(3):211-223. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00729-7. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
3
Patient-reported outcomes in integrated health and social care: A scoping review.
综合健康与社会照护中的患者报告结局:一项范围综述。
JRSM Open. 2024 Mar 24;15(3):20542704241232866. doi: 10.1177/20542704241232866. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Systematic review of 29 self-report instruments for assessing quality of life in older adults receiving aged care services.对 29 种用于评估接受老年护理服务的老年人生活质量的自我报告工具的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 18;11(11):e050892. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050892.
5
Quality of life measurement in community-based aged care - understanding variation between clients and between care service providers.社区老年护理中的生活质量测量——了解客户之间以及护理服务提供者之间的差异。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jun 28;21(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02254-2.
6
At the grassroots of home and community-based aged care: strategies for successful consumer engagement.居家和社区基础老年护理的根基:成功让消费者参与的策略。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e028754. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028754.
7
Ageing well: evaluation of social participation and quality of life tools to enhance community aged care (study protocol).健康老龄化:评估社会参与和生活质量工具以加强社区老年护理(研究方案)。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1094-2.