Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 1;122(5):744-748. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
Preoperative stress testing in asymptomatic patients is considered rarely appropriate in patients with: (1) moderate to good functional capacity (≥4 metabolic equivalent (METs)), (2) no clinical risk factors, or who are (3) asymptomatic after revascularization, normal stress test, or normal coronary angiography within 1 year. Preoperative stress testing is also not recommended in patients at low risk (<1%) for adverse cardiac events. We investigated the frequency of rarely appropriate and low-risk preoperative stress testing across medical specialties at our institution in asymptomatic patients when applying appropriate use criteria and two different perioperative risk models. We reviewed preoperative stress tests for noncardiac surgeries performed at Hershey Medical Center from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014. Perioperative cardiac risk was estimated using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest risk calculator and the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) score. We analyzed 501 preoperative stress tests meeting the study criteria. When applying appropriate use criteria, we found that 336 of 501 studies (67%) were rarely appropriate. When applying the risk score models, 369 of 501 studies (74%) were determined to be low risk by the RCRI (RCRI score ≤1), and 248 of 361 stress tests (69%) were determined to be low risk by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest risk calculator. Low risk and rarely appropriate preoperative stress testing was common across all ordering specialties reviewed. In conclusion, these findings suggest that preoperative stress testing is broadly overused in asymptomatic patients and that interventions to reduce rarely appropriate and low-risk preoperative stress testing require a multispecialty approach.
在以下情况下,无症状患者的术前应激测试被认为很少合适:(1) 功能能力中等至良好(≥4 代谢当量 (METs)),(2) 无临床危险因素,或 (3) 血管重建后无症状、应激测试正常或 1 年内冠状动脉造影正常。术前应激测试也不推荐用于不良心脏事件风险低(<1%)的患者。我们应用适当使用标准和两种不同的围手术期风险模型,调查了无症状患者在我们机构的多个医学专业中,术前应激测试很少合适和低风险的频率。我们回顾了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日在 Hershey 医疗中心进行的非心脏手术的术前应激测试。围手术期心脏风险使用国家手术质量改进计划心肌梗死和心搏骤停风险计算器和修订后的心脏风险指数 (RCRI) 评分进行估计。我们分析了符合研究标准的 501 项术前应激测试。应用适当使用标准时,我们发现 501 项研究中有 336 项(67%)很少合适。应用风险评分模型时,501 项研究中有 369 项(74%)根据 RCRI(RCRI 评分≤1)被确定为低风险,361 项应激测试中有 248 项(69%)根据国家手术质量改进计划心肌梗死和心搏骤停风险计算器被确定为低风险。在所有审查的开单科室中,低风险和很少合适的术前应激测试都很常见。总之,这些发现表明,术前应激测试在无症状患者中广泛过度使用,需要采取多专业方法来减少很少合适和低风险的术前应激测试。