VHB, Inc., 101 Walnut St, Watertown, MA 02472, United States.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 231 Sackett Building, University Park, PA 16802, United States.
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Nov;120:28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.030. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
Horizontal curves on two-way, two-lane rural roads pose critical safety concerns. Accurate prediction of safety performance at these locations is vital to properly allocate resources as a part of any safety management process. The current method of predicting safety performance on horizontal curves relies on the application of a safety performance function (SPF) developed using only tangent sections and adjusting this value using a crash modification factor (CMF). However, this process inherently assumes that safety performance on curves and tangent sections share the same general functional relationships with variables included in the SPF, notably traffic volumes and segment length, even though research suggests otherwise. In light of this, the goal of this paper is to systematically study the relationship between safety performance and traffic volumes on horizontal curves of two-lane, two-way rural roads and to compare this to the safety performance of tangent sections. The propensity scores-potential outcomes framework is used to help ensure similarity between tangent and curve sections considered in the study, while mixed-effects negative binomial regression is used to quantify safety performance. The results reveal that safety performance on horizontal curves differs significantly from that on tangent sections with respect to both traffic volumes and segment length. Significant differences were also found between the safety performance on tangents and curves relative to other roadway features. These results suggest that curve-specific SPFs should be considered in the next edition of the Highway Safety Manual.
双向两车道农村道路的平曲线存在重大安全隐患。准确预测这些位置的安全性能对于合理分配资源至关重要,这是任何安全管理过程的一部分。目前,预测平曲线安全性能的方法是应用仅使用切线部分开发的安全性能函数 (SPF),并使用碰撞修正系数 (CMF) 调整该值。然而,该过程本质上假设曲线和切线部分的安全性能与 SPF 中包含的变量具有相同的一般功能关系,尤其是交通量和路段长度,尽管研究表明并非如此。有鉴于此,本文的目标是系统研究双车道、双向农村道路平曲线的安全性能与交通量之间的关系,并将其与切线部分的安全性能进行比较。倾向评分-潜在结果框架用于帮助确保研究中考虑的切线和曲线部分之间的相似性,而混合效应负二项回归用于量化安全性能。结果表明,平曲线的安全性能在交通量和路段长度方面与切线部分有显著差异。切线和曲线的安全性能与其他道路特征的安全性能也存在显著差异。这些结果表明,在下一版《公路安全手册》中应考虑特定于曲线的 SPF。