• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节外展肌撕裂的影像学危险因素和征象。

Radiographic Risk Factors and Signs of Abductor Tears in the Hip.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.

American Hip Institute, Hinsdale, Illinois.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2018 Aug;34(8):2389-2397. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.03.039. Epub 2018 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2018.03.039
PMID:30078428
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to identify radiographic risk factors (RRFs) and radiographic signs of abductor tendon tears.

METHODS

Between April 2008 and October 2015, patients with intraoperative diagnosis of partial- or full-thickness abductor tear noted at the time of open or endoscopic treatment were included in this study. Exclusion criteria included lack of preoperative standard supine pelvic radiograph, lack of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or abductor tear not present at the time of operative intervention. Patients were matched by age ±5 years, gender, and body mass index ±5 with patients with no abductor pathology by clinical exam and MRI. A standardized supine anterior-posterior pelvis radiograph was performed on all patients. The radiographs were evaluated for RRF (pelvic width, body weight moment arm, abductor moment arm, abductor angle, pelvic height) and signs of abductor tendon pathology (greater trochanteric enthesophyte). Femoral version was measured on MRI when images were available. Statistical analysis was performed and included bivariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

There were 152 patients with abductor tears identified at the time of surgery out of 2,838 eligible patients matched with 125 patients without abductor tendon pathology. The study institution was unable to perform a 1:1 match because of the advanced age of the abductor tendon group, which led to a greater age in the abductor group (n = 58) versus the control group (n = 54; P = .01. In abductor group the average age was 58, and 137 of 152 (90%) patients were female; in the control group the average age was 54, with 111 of 125 (89%) patients being female. Abductor tear patients were treated with surgical repair. The RRFs found with bivariate analysis were an increased pelvic width (14.8 cm for abductor tears vs 14.3 cm for control; P < .001), body weight moment arm (11.1 cm vs 10.9 cm; P < .001), and abductor moment arm (7.8 cm vs 7.6 cm; P < .001); decreased femoral anteversion (7.6° vs 10.6°; P = .045); and enthesophyte presence (41% vs 3%; P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis of all variables showed that teardrop distance and enthesophyte presence were the 2 variables most predictive of abductor tears, and other variables did not significantly increase or decrease the likelihood of tear when these 2 variables were considered. The presence of an enthesophyte on the greater trochanter was notable for an odds ratio of 20.7 of having an abductor tear.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with abductor tears have a wider pelvis, longer abductor moment arm, and longer body weight moment arm and have greater trochanteric enthesophyte as noted on nearly half of patients with an abductor tear. Presence of an enthesophyte was noted to have an odds ratio of 20.7 and a positive predictive value of 94% for having an abductor tendon tear. The 2 variables predictive of abductor tendon tear when controlling for all variables were enthesophyte presence and teardrop distance, with no other variables significantly increasing or decreasing the likelihood of tear when these 2 variables were considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定导致髋外展肌腱撕裂的影像学危险因素(RRF)和影像学征象。

方法

2008 年 4 月至 2015 年 10 月期间,对接受开放或内镜治疗的术中诊断为部分或全层髋外展肌撕裂的患者进行了研究。排除标准包括术前缺乏标准仰卧骨盆 X 线片、术前缺乏磁共振成像(MRI)或手术干预时不存在髋外展肌撕裂。通过年龄±5 岁、性别和体质量指数±5 与临床检查和 MRI 无髋外展病变的患者进行匹配。所有患者均行标准仰卧骨盆前后位 X 线片检查。评估 RRF(骨盆宽度、体重力臂、髋外展力臂、髋外展角、骨盆高度)和髋外展肌腱病变征象(大转子附着点骨赘)。当有 MRI 图像时,测量股骨前倾角。进行了包括双变量和多变量分析的统计学分析。

结果

在 2838 例符合条件的患者中,有 152 例在手术时发现有髋外展肌撕裂,与 125 例无髋外展肌腱病变的患者相匹配。由于髋外展肌腱组患者年龄较大,本研究机构无法进行 1:1 匹配,导致髋外展组(n=58)的平均年龄大于对照组(n=54;P=.01)。在髋外展组中,平均年龄为 58 岁,152 例患者中有 137 例(90%)为女性;在对照组中,平均年龄为 54 岁,125 例患者中有 111 例(89%)为女性。髋外展肌撕裂患者接受了手术修复。双变量分析发现的 RRF 包括骨盆宽度增加(髋外展撕裂患者为 14.8cm,对照组为 14.3cm;P<0.001)、体重力臂增加(髋外展撕裂患者为 11.1cm,对照组为 10.9cm;P<0.001)和髋外展力臂增加(髋外展撕裂患者为 7.8cm,对照组为 7.6cm;P<0.001);股骨前倾角减小(髋外展撕裂患者为 7.6°,对照组为 10.6°;P=0.045);附着点骨赘存在(41%比 3%;P<0.001)。所有变量的多变量回归分析显示,撕脱距离和附着点骨赘的存在是最能预测髋外展撕裂的 2 个变量,当考虑这 2 个变量时,其他变量并不能显著增加或降低撕裂的可能性。大转子附着点骨赘的存在具有 20.7 的髋外展撕裂的优势比。

结论

髋外展肌撕裂患者的骨盆更宽,髋外展力臂和体重力臂更长,并且近一半的髋外展肌撕裂患者的大转子附着点有附着点骨赘。附着点骨赘的存在对髋外展肌腱撕裂的优势比为 20.7,阳性预测值为 94%。在控制所有变量的情况下,对髋外展肌腱撕裂具有预测作用的是附着点骨赘和撕脱距离,当考虑这 2 个变量时,没有其他变量显著增加或降低撕裂的可能性。

相似文献

1
Radiographic Risk Factors and Signs of Abductor Tears in the Hip.髋关节外展肌撕裂的影像学危险因素和征象。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Aug;34(8):2389-2397. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.03.039. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
2
Pertrochanteric Calcifications in Patients With Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: Description, Prevalence, and Correlation With Intraoperatively Diagnosed Hip Abductor Tendon Injuries.大转子疼痛综合征患者的转子间钙化:描述、患病率,以及与术中诊断的髋外展肌腱损伤的相关性。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jun;49(7):1759-1768. doi: 10.1177/03635465211008104. Epub 2021 May 6.
3
Development of a Predictive Algorithm for Symptomatic Hip Abductor Tears in Patients Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy.开发一种用于预测初次髋关节镜检查患者髋关节外展肌症状性撕裂的预测算法。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Feb;49(2):497-504. doi: 10.1177/0363546520980461. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Surgical treatment of hip abductor tendon tears.髋关节外展肌腱撕裂的手术治疗。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 7;95(15):1420-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00709.
5
Does partial tear repair of adjacent tendons improve the outcome of supraspinatus tendonfull-thickness tear reinsertion?相邻肌腱的部分撕裂修复能否改善冈上肌腱全层撕裂再植的效果?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Nov;100(7):721-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
6
Application of the Goutallier/Fuchs Rotator Cuff Classification to the Evaluation of Hip Abductor Tendon Tears and the Clinical Correlation With Outcome After Repair.将古塔利耶/富克斯肩袖分类法应用于髋外展肌腱撕裂的评估及修复后临床结果的相关性研究。
Arthroscopy. 2015 Nov;31(11):2145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.04.101. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
A review of surgical repair methods and patient outcomes for gluteal tendon tears.臀肌腱撕裂的手术修复方法及患者预后综述。
Hip Int. 2015 Jan-Feb;25(1):15-23. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000183. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
8
Abductor tendon tears of the hip: evaluation and management.髋关节外展肌腱撕裂:评估与处理。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Jul;19(7):385-91. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201107000-00001.
9
Outcomes after primary open or endoscopic abductor tendon repair in the hip: a systematic review of the literature.髋关节原发性开放性或内镜下外展肌腱修复术后的疗效:文献系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar;31(3):530-40. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
10
Endoscopic repair of partial-thickness undersurface tears of the gluteus medius tendon.经内镜修复臀中肌肌腱下表面部分厚度撕裂。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Nov;99(7):853-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Spine-Abductor Syndrome: Novel Associations Between Lumbar Spine Disease and Hip Gluteal Muscle Pathology.脊柱外展肌综合征:腰椎疾病与髋部臀肌病变之间的新关联。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Mar 5;107(5):496-503. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00012. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
2
What Is the Prevalence of Hip Abductor Pathology in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty?接受全髋关节置换术的患者中髋外展肌病变的患病率是多少?
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Dec 24;31:101601. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101601. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Association between abductor tears and hip pathology: A nationwide large cohort study.
外展肌撕裂与髋关节病变之间的关联:一项全国性大型队列研究。
J Orthop. 2024 Apr 1;53:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.03.036. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Repair of Symptomatic Partial Gluteus Medius Tear During Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach.全髋关节置换术中经直接前路入路修复有症状的臀中肌部分撕裂
Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Jan 16;10(2):e575-e580. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.10.043. eCollection 2021 Feb.
5
Open Gluteus Medius and Minimus Repair With Double-Row Technique and Bioinductive Implant Augmentation.采用双排技术和生物诱导植入物增强术进行开放性臀中肌和臀小肌修复。
Arthrosc Tech. 2019 May 17;8(6):e585-e589. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2019.01.019. eCollection 2019 Jun.