Bowden R A, Sayers M, Flournoy N, Newton B, Banaji M, Thomas E D, Meyers J D
N Engl J Med. 1986 Apr 17;314(16):1006-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198604173141602.
In an attempt to prevent primary cytomegalovirus infection after marrow transplantation, we randomly assigned 97 patients who were seronegative for antibody to cytomegalovirus before transplantation to receive one of the following: (1) both intravenous cytomegalovirus immune globulin and seronegative blood products (23 patients); (2) seronegative blood products alone (28 patients); (3) globulin alone (22 patients); or (4) neither treatment (24 patients). Patients not assigned to receive seronegative blood products received unscreened blood products from random donors. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection according to study group among patients in the study for at least 62 days was 5 percent, 13 percent, 24 percent, and 40 percent, respectively. Among 57 patients with seronegative marrow donors, those who received seronegative blood products had significantly less infection (1 of 32) than those who received standard blood products (8 of 25, P less than 0.007). In contrast, the use of seronegative blood products did not appear to prevent cytomegalovirus infection among patients with seropositive marrow donors. The possibility that cytomegalovirus immune globulin as used in this study can prevent cytomegalovirus infection or ameliorate cytomegalovirus disease was not confirmed, and it cannot be recommended for routine use without additional study.
为了预防骨髓移植后原发性巨细胞病毒感染,我们将97例移植前巨细胞病毒抗体血清学阴性的患者随机分组,分别接受以下治疗之一:(1)静脉注射巨细胞病毒免疫球蛋白和血清学阴性的血液制品(23例患者);(2)仅接受血清学阴性的血液制品(28例患者);(3)仅接受球蛋白(22例患者);或(4)不接受任何治疗(24例患者)。未被分配接受血清学阴性血液制品的患者接受来自随机供者的未筛查血液制品。在研究中至少随访62天的患者中,各研究组的巨细胞病毒感染发生率分别为5%、13%、24%和40%。在57例骨髓供者血清学阴性的患者中,接受血清学阴性血液制品的患者感染率(32例中的1例)显著低于接受标准血液制品的患者(25例中的8例,P<0.007)。相比之下,对于骨髓供者血清学阳性的患者,使用血清学阴性血液制品似乎不能预防巨细胞病毒感染。本研究中使用的巨细胞病毒免疫球蛋白能否预防巨细胞病毒感染或改善巨细胞病毒疾病尚未得到证实,在没有进一步研究的情况下,不建议常规使用。