Laura M. Keohane (
David G. Stevenson is an associate professor in the Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, in Nashville.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Aug;37(8):1265-1273. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0143.
Cost containment for dual-eligible beneficiaries (those enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid) is a key policy goal, but few studies have examined spending trends for this population. We contrasted growth in Medicare fee-for-service per beneficiary spending for those with and without Medicaid in the period 2007-15. Relative to Medicare-only enrollees, dual-eligible beneficiaries consistently had higher overall Medicare spending levels; however, they experienced steeper declines in spending growth over the study period. These trends varied across populations of interest. For instance, dual-eligible beneficiaries ages sixty-five and older went from having annual spending growth rates that were 1.8 percentage points higher than Medicare-only beneficiaries in 2008 to rates that were 1.1 percentage points lower in 2015. Across population groups, long-term users of nursing home care had some of the highest spending growth rates, averaging 1.7-4.1 percent annually depending on age group and Medicaid participation. These findings have implications for value-based payment and other Medicare policies aimed at controlling spending for dual-eligible beneficiaries.
控制双重资格受益人的(即同时参加医疗保险和医疗补助的)成本是一个关键的政策目标,但很少有研究考察过这一人群的支出趋势。我们对比了 2007 年至 2015 年期间,有和没有医疗补助的医疗保险按服务收费的每位受益人的支出增长情况。与仅参加医疗保险的参保人相比,双重资格受益人的整体医疗保险支出水平始终较高;然而,在研究期间,他们的支出增长率下降幅度更大。这些趋势在不同的目标人群中有所不同。例如,在 2008 年,65 岁及以上的双重资格受益人的年支出增长率比仅参加医疗保险的参保人高 1.8 个百分点,而到 2015 年,这一增长率则低 1.1 个百分点。在所有人群中,长期使用疗养院护理的人的支出增长率最高,根据年龄组和是否参加医疗补助,每年平均增长 1.7-4.1%。这些发现对基于价值的支付和其他旨在控制双重资格受益人的支出的医疗保险政策具有重要意义。