Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Feb;80(1):92-100. doi: 10.1177/10775587221095956. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
Dual-eligible beneficiaries with Medicare and Medicaid coverage generally have greater utilization and spending levels than Medicare-only beneficiaries on postacute services, raising questions about how strategies to curb postacute spending will affect dual-eligible beneficiaries. We compared trends in postacute spending and use related to inpatient episodes at a population and episode level for dual-eligible and Medicare-only beneficiaries over the years 2009-2017. Although dual-eligible beneficiaries had consistently higher inpatient and postacute service use and spending than Medicare-only populations, both populations experienced similar declines in inpatient and postacute measures over time. Conditional on having an inpatient stay, most types of postacute service use increased regardless of dual-eligible status. These consistent patterns in episode-related postacute spending for Medicare-only and dual-eligible beneficiaries-decreased episode-related spending and use on a per beneficiary basis and increased use and spending on a per episode basis-suggest that changing patterns of care affect both populations.
具有医疗保险和医疗补助覆盖的双重资格受益人在急性后期服务方面的利用率和支出水平通常高于仅医疗保险受益人的利用率和支出水平,这引发了人们对控制急性后期支出的策略将如何影响双重资格受益人的疑问。我们比较了 2009 年至 2017 年期间,在人群和事件层面上,双重资格受益人和仅医疗保险受益人的急性后期支出和使用与住院事件相关的趋势。尽管双重资格受益人的住院和急性后期服务利用率和支出一直高于仅医疗保险人群,但随着时间的推移,这两个群体的住院和急性后期措施都出现了类似的下降。在有住院治疗的情况下,无论是否具有双重资格,大多数类型的急性后期服务使用都有所增加。仅医疗保险受益人和双重资格受益人的与事件相关的急性后期支出的这些一致模式——按每位受益人的基础减少与事件相关的支出和使用,按每次事件的基础增加使用和支出——表明护理模式的变化影响到这两个群体。