• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pain pattern classification and directional preference for patients with neck pain.颈部疼痛患者的疼痛模式分类及方向偏好
J Man Manip Ther. 2018 Aug;26(4):230-236. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2018.1454087. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
2
Pain pattern classification and directional preference are associated with clinical outcomes for patients with low back pain.疼痛模式分类和方向偏好与腰痛患者的临床结局相关。
J Man Manip Ther. 2018 Feb;26(1):18-24. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2017.1343538. Epub 2017 Jun 25.
3
Association between directional preference and centralization in patients with low back pain.方向性偏好与腰痛患者集中化的相关性研究。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Jan;41(1):22-31. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3415. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
4
Directional preference constructs for patients' neck pain in the absence of centralization.无症状集中化情况下患者颈部疼痛的方向偏好结构
J Man Manip Ther. 2019 Sep;27(4):229-236. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1568660. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
5
Directional preference constructs for patients' low back pain in the absence of centralization.无症状集中化情况下患者下背痛的方向偏好结构
J Man Manip Ther. 2018 Dec;26(5):281-291. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2018.1505329. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
6
Classification by pain pattern for patients with cervical spine radiculopathy.根据颈椎病患者的疼痛模式进行分类。
J Man Manip Ther. 2020 Jul;28(3):160-169. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1587135. Epub 2019 May 2.
7
Association between centralization and directional preference and functional and pain outcomes in patients with neck pain.颈痛患者的集中化和方向性偏好与功能和疼痛结局之间的关联。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Feb;44(2):68-75. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4632. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
8
The Influence of Centralization and Directional Preference on Spinal Control in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain.集中化和方向偏好对非特异性下腰痛患者脊柱控制的影响。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Apr;46(4):258-69. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6158. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
9
Prevalence of classification methods for patients with lumbar impairments using the McKenzie syndromes, pain pattern, manipulation, and stabilization clinical prediction rules.使用麦肯齐综合征、疼痛模式、手法治疗和稳定化临床预测规则对腰椎损伤患者进行分类的方法的患病率。
J Man Manip Ther. 2010 Dec;18(4):197-204. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12804993426965.
10
Effect of Adding McKenzie Syndrome, Centralization, Directional Preference, and Psychosocial Classification Variables to a Risk-Adjusted Model Predicting Functional Status Outcomes for Patients With Lumbar Impairments.将麦肯齐综合征、症状集中化、方向偏好和心理社会分类变量添加到预测腰椎损伤患者功能状态结果的风险调整模型中的效果。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Sep;46(9):726-41. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6266. Epub 2016 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of a Therapeutic Exercise Protocol for Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Back Pain in Primary Health Care: A Single-Group Retrospective Cohort Study.基层医疗中慢性非特异性背痛患者治疗性运动方案的效果:单组回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 12;12(20):6478. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206478.
2
Immediate neck hypoalgesic effects of craniocervical flexion exercises and cervical retraction exercises among individuals with non-acute neck pain and a directional preference for retraction or extension: preliminary pretest-posttest randomized experimental design.颅颈屈曲运动和颈椎后缩运动对有非急性颈部疼痛且有后缩或伸展方向偏好个体的颈部即时镇痛效果:初步的预测试-后测试随机实验设计
J Man Manip Ther. 2023 Oct;31(5):368-375. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2201918. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
3
Classification by pain pattern for patients with cervical spine radiculopathy.根据颈椎病患者的疼痛模式进行分类。
J Man Manip Ther. 2020 Jul;28(3):160-169. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1587135. Epub 2019 May 2.
4
Directional preference constructs for patients' neck pain in the absence of centralization.无症状集中化情况下患者颈部疼痛的方向偏好结构
J Man Manip Ther. 2019 Sep;27(4):229-236. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1568660. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between centralization and directional preference and functional and pain outcomes in patients with neck pain.颈痛患者的集中化和方向性偏好与功能和疼痛结局之间的关联。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Feb;44(2):68-75. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4632. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
2
Centralization and directional preference: a systematic review.集中化与方向偏好:一项系统综述
Man Ther. 2012 Dec;17(6):497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
3
Association between directional preference and centralization in patients with low back pain.方向性偏好与腰痛患者集中化的相关性研究。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Jan;41(1):22-31. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3415. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
4
Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index, patient-specific functional scale, and numeric pain rating scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy.颈椎神经根病患者的颈部残疾指数、患者特异性功能量表和数字疼痛评分量表的可靠性、结构有效性和反应性。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Oct;89(10):831-9. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181ec98e6.
5
Neck pain: Clinical practice guidelines linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association.颈部疼痛:与美国物理治疗协会骨科分会的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》相关的临床实践指南。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Sep;38(9):A1-A34. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.0303. Epub 2008 Sep 1.
6
Centralization: prevalence and effect on treatment outcomes using a standardized operational definition and measurement method.集中化:采用标准化操作定义和测量方法的患病率及其对治疗结果的影响。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Mar;38(3):116-25. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2596.
7
Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain.机械性颈部疼痛患者的颈部功能障碍指数和数字疼痛评分量表的心理测量特性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126.
8
Preliminary examination of a proposed treatment-based classification system for patients receiving physical therapy interventions for neck pain.对接受颈部疼痛物理治疗干预的患者基于治疗的分类系统的初步检查。
Phys Ther. 2007 May;87(5):513-24. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060192. Epub 2007 Mar 20.
9
Development of a clinical prediction rule for guiding treatment of a subgroup of patients with neck pain: use of thoracic spine manipulation, exercise, and patient education.制定用于指导一组颈痛患者治疗的临床预测规则:胸椎整复、运动及患者教育的应用
Phys Ther. 2007 Jan;87(1):9-23. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060155. Epub 2006 Dec 1.
10
Proposal of a classification system for patients with neck pain.颈部疼痛患者分类系统的提议
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Nov;34(11):686-96; discussion 697-700. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.11.686.

颈部疼痛患者的疼痛模式分类及方向偏好

Pain pattern classification and directional preference for patients with neck pain.

作者信息

Yarznbowicz Richard, Tao Minjing, Wlodarski Matt, Dolutan Jonathan

机构信息

DPT, Center for Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Man Manip Ther. 2018 Aug;26(4):230-236. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2018.1454087. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1080/10669817.2018.1454087
PMID:30083046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6075025/
Abstract

Pain Pattern Classification (PPC) and Directional Preference (DP) have been shown to be predictive of health care outcomes and serve to guide orthopedic clinical decision making. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study to verify the association between PPC, DP, and clinical outcomes. Clinical outcome measures including pain intensity and disability were completed at first examination and follow-up by 335 patients. A Pearson's chi-squared test was used to determine differences in prevalence rates for the categorical variables, and two-sample t-tests were used to determine differences in rates for the continuous variables. A Tukey's range test was used to determine differences in follow-up pain intensity and disability for neck pain dual-classification schemes. The prevalence of DP was 82.4%. The prevalence of CEN, Non-CEN, and Non-Classifiable (NC) was 15.2%, 42.1%, and 25.1%, respectively. The prevalence of DP was lowest for patients with sub-acute symptoms and who were <45 years old. Patients classified as DP CEN had, on average 2.62 NDI units less than patients classified as Non-DP. Patients classified as DP CEN had, on average, 0.90 pain intensity units less than patients classified as Non-DP at follow-up. Patients who demonstrated DP CEN did not have clinically significant lower pain intensity or disability at follow-up than patients who demonstrated Non-DP. The results of this investigation need to be interpreted with caution with respect to the study design and it's subsequent strengths and limitations. 1b.

摘要

疼痛模式分类(PPC)和方向偏好(DP)已被证明可预测医疗保健结果,并有助于指导骨科临床决策。我们进行了一项前瞻性观察队列研究,以验证PPC、DP与临床结果之间的关联。335名患者在首次检查和随访时完成了包括疼痛强度和残疾程度在内的临床结果测量。使用Pearson卡方检验确定分类变量患病率的差异,使用两样本t检验确定连续变量患病率的差异。使用Tukey范围检验确定颈部疼痛双重分类方案在随访时疼痛强度和残疾程度的差异。DP的患病率为82.4%。CEN、非CEN和不可分类(NC)的患病率分别为15.2%、42.1%和25.1%。亚急性症状且年龄<45岁的患者中DP的患病率最低。分类为DP CEN的患者平均比分类为非DP的患者少2.62个NDI单位。在随访时,分类为DP CEN的患者平均比分类为非DP的患者疼痛强度单位少0.90。与表现为非DP的患者相比,表现为DP CEN的患者在随访时疼痛强度或残疾程度并没有临床上显著更低。就研究设计及其后续的优势和局限性而言,本调查结果需要谨慎解读。1b。