Yarznbowicz Richard, Tao Minjing, Wlodarski Matt, Dolutan Jonathan
DPT, Center for Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
J Man Manip Ther. 2018 Aug;26(4):230-236. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2018.1454087. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
Pain Pattern Classification (PPC) and Directional Preference (DP) have been shown to be predictive of health care outcomes and serve to guide orthopedic clinical decision making. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study to verify the association between PPC, DP, and clinical outcomes. Clinical outcome measures including pain intensity and disability were completed at first examination and follow-up by 335 patients. A Pearson's chi-squared test was used to determine differences in prevalence rates for the categorical variables, and two-sample t-tests were used to determine differences in rates for the continuous variables. A Tukey's range test was used to determine differences in follow-up pain intensity and disability for neck pain dual-classification schemes. The prevalence of DP was 82.4%. The prevalence of CEN, Non-CEN, and Non-Classifiable (NC) was 15.2%, 42.1%, and 25.1%, respectively. The prevalence of DP was lowest for patients with sub-acute symptoms and who were <45 years old. Patients classified as DP CEN had, on average 2.62 NDI units less than patients classified as Non-DP. Patients classified as DP CEN had, on average, 0.90 pain intensity units less than patients classified as Non-DP at follow-up. Patients who demonstrated DP CEN did not have clinically significant lower pain intensity or disability at follow-up than patients who demonstrated Non-DP. The results of this investigation need to be interpreted with caution with respect to the study design and it's subsequent strengths and limitations. 1b.
疼痛模式分类(PPC)和方向偏好(DP)已被证明可预测医疗保健结果,并有助于指导骨科临床决策。我们进行了一项前瞻性观察队列研究,以验证PPC、DP与临床结果之间的关联。335名患者在首次检查和随访时完成了包括疼痛强度和残疾程度在内的临床结果测量。使用Pearson卡方检验确定分类变量患病率的差异,使用两样本t检验确定连续变量患病率的差异。使用Tukey范围检验确定颈部疼痛双重分类方案在随访时疼痛强度和残疾程度的差异。DP的患病率为82.4%。CEN、非CEN和不可分类(NC)的患病率分别为15.2%、42.1%和25.1%。亚急性症状且年龄<45岁的患者中DP的患病率最低。分类为DP CEN的患者平均比分类为非DP的患者少2.62个NDI单位。在随访时,分类为DP CEN的患者平均比分类为非DP的患者疼痛强度单位少0.90。与表现为非DP的患者相比,表现为DP CEN的患者在随访时疼痛强度或残疾程度并没有临床上显著更低。就研究设计及其后续的优势和局限性而言,本调查结果需要谨慎解读。1b。