• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药品质量:巴西卫生监管局(ANVISA)在国际检查中发现的良好生产规范缺陷。

Quality of medicines: Deficiencies found by Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) on good manufacturing practices international inspections.

机构信息

Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA), Brasilia, DF, Brazil.

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade de Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, DF, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Aug 8;13(8):e0202084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202084. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0202084
PMID:30089162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6082550/
Abstract

The circulation of poor quality medicines, especially in the developing countries, is a public health concern. Compliance with good manufacturing practices (GMP) is essential to ensure the quality, efficacy, and safety of medicines. This study evaluated the outcomes of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency's (ANVISA) international inspections of two years (2015 and 2016) and compared these to those of other regulatory authorities. The information from 255 inspection reports was analyzed, and the type and extent of deficiencies were collected. In the period evaluated, 62.75% of ANVISA-inspected companies were classified as GMP "satisfactory," 24.71% were classified as having "on demand" status, and 12.55% of inspections concluded that the company did not comply with Brazilian GMP regulations ("unsatisfactory"). The most common areas of deficiency were documentation (28.63%) and premises (26.27%). The pattern of deficiencies was similar to the findings of other regulatory agencies. However, ANVISA detected a more significant number of non-compliance results than other authorities, which may be caused by differences in classifications adopted by each Agency. Furthermore, manufacturers inspected by ANVISA may follow different standards and practices for products manufactured for the Brazilian market. Disclosure of main GMP deficiencies found can be useful for encouraging the industry to comply with GMP, and additional guidelines in the specific areas where deficiencies are often identified may be useful to industry to improve GMP compliance. Harmonization of GMP guidelines and inspection procedures are the key steps to avoid duplicate work, but regulatory authorities also need to work together to enforce the proper level of GMP compliance by pharmaceutical manufacturers, assuring high quality and safe medicines supply.

摘要

劣质药品的流通,尤其是在发展中国家,是一个公共卫生关注的问题。遵守良好生产规范(GMP)对于确保药品的质量、疗效和安全性至关重要。本研究评估了巴西卫生监管机构(ANVISA)两年(2015 年和 2016 年)国际检查的结果,并将这些结果与其他监管机构进行了比较。分析了 255 份检查报告的信息,并收集了缺陷的类型和程度。在所评估的期间,62.75%接受 ANVISA 检查的公司被归类为 GMP“满意”,24.71%被归类为“按需”状态,12.55%的检查结论为公司不符合巴西 GMP 规定(“不满意”)。最常见的缺陷领域是文件(28.63%)和场所(26.27%)。缺陷模式与其他监管机构的发现相似。然而,ANVISA 检测到的不合规结果数量多于其他机构,这可能是由于每个机构采用的分类方法不同所致。此外,ANVISA 检查的制造商可能为巴西市场生产的产品遵循不同的标准和实践。披露发现的主要 GMP 缺陷可以有助于鼓励行业遵守 GMP,并且在经常发现缺陷的特定领域增加指南可能有助于行业提高 GMP 合规性。GMP 指南和检查程序的协调是避免重复工作的关键步骤,但监管机构也需要共同努力,确保制药制造商适当遵守 GMP 规定,确保高质量和安全的药品供应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/6082550/675bf12be82a/pone.0202084.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/6082550/a99a0680ceb6/pone.0202084.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/6082550/874e53e8c163/pone.0202084.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/6082550/294b895d5df5/pone.0202084.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/6082550/d1f36e4a3d92/pone.0202084.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/6082550/675bf12be82a/pone.0202084.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/6082550/a99a0680ceb6/pone.0202084.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/6082550/874e53e8c163/pone.0202084.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/6082550/294b895d5df5/pone.0202084.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/6082550/d1f36e4a3d92/pone.0202084.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/6082550/675bf12be82a/pone.0202084.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of medicines: Deficiencies found by Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) on good manufacturing practices international inspections.药品质量:巴西卫生监管局(ANVISA)在国际检查中发现的良好生产规范缺陷。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 8;13(8):e0202084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202084. eCollection 2018.
2
The requirements for manufacturing highly active or sensitising drugs comparing Good Manufacturing Practices.对比药品生产质量管理规范,生产高活性或致敏性药物的要求。
Acta Biomed. 2019 May 23;90(2):288-299. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i2.8340.
3
Institutional barriers and enablers to implementing and complying with internationally accepted quality standards in the local pharmaceutical industry of Pakistan: a qualitative study.巴基斯坦当地制药行业实施和遵守国际公认质量标准的体制障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Jul 1;34(6):440-449. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz054.
4
Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal.援助条件、国际药品生产质量管理规范标准与本土生产权:尼泊尔本土生产案例研究
Global Health. 2015 Jun 14;11:25. doi: 10.1186/s12992-015-0110-3.
5
Good manufacturing practice inspections conducted by Tanzania medicines and medical devices authority: a comparative study of two fiscal years from 2018 to 2020.坦桑尼亚药品和医疗器械管理局进行的药品生产质量管理规范检查:2018年至2020年两个财政年度的比较研究
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Sep 16;17(1):2399722. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2399722. eCollection 2024.
6
Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products in Bulgaria: an Analysis of Regulatory Inspection Findings.保加利亚药品生产质量管理规范:法规检查结果分析。
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2020 Mar 31;62(1):165-171. doi: 10.3897/folmed.62.e49802.
7
Recall of substandard medicines in Brazil during the period 2010-2018.2010-2018 年巴西召回不合格药品情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 10;23(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09225-w.
8
The Utility of Remote Inspections During the COVID-19 Health Emergency and in the Postpandemic Setting.在 COVID-19 卫生紧急情况期间和大流行后环境中远程检查的效用。
Clin Ther. 2021 Dec;43(12):2046-2063. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
9
Campaign manufacturing of highly active or sensitizing drugs: a comparison between the GMPs of various Regulatory Agencies.高活性或致敏性药物的批次生产:各监管机构药品生产质量管理规范的比较
Clin Ter. 2020 Jan-Feb;170(1):e66-e73. doi: 10.7417/CT.2020.2191.
10
A Baseline Analysis of Regulatory Review Timelines for ANVISA: 2013-2016.巴西国家卫生监督局(ANVISA)监管审查时间表的基线分析:2013 - 2016年
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Nov;54(6):1428-1435. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00169-5. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
extracts elicit anti-diabetic neuropathic pain by modulating inflammatory cytokines.提取物通过调节炎性细胞因子引发抗糖尿病性神经病理性疼痛。
J Tradit Complement Med. 2024 May 1;15(4):388-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2024.04.012. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Good manufacturing practice inspections conducted by Tanzania medicines and medical devices authority: a comparative study of two fiscal years from 2018 to 2020.坦桑尼亚药品和医疗器械管理局进行的药品生产质量管理规范检查:2018年至2020年两个财政年度的比较研究
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Sep 16;17(1):2399722. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2399722. eCollection 2024.
3
Recall of substandard medicines in Brazil during the period 2010-2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Main Reasons for Registration Application Refusal of Generic and Similar Pharmaceutical Drug Products by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA).巴西卫生监管机构(巴西国家卫生监督局,ANVISA)拒绝通用和类似药品注册申请的主要原因。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7894937. doi: 10.1155/2017/7894937. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
2
Essential medicines for universal health coverage.全民健康覆盖的基本药物。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):403-476. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31599-9. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
3
[Convergence of healthcare regulation in the Americas: history, development, and new challenges].
2010-2018 年巴西召回不合格药品情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 10;23(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09225-w.
4
Institutional barriers and enablers to implementing and complying with internationally accepted quality standards in the local pharmaceutical industry of Pakistan: a qualitative study.巴基斯坦当地制药行业实施和遵守国际公认质量标准的体制障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Jul 1;34(6):440-449. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz054.
[美洲医疗保健监管的趋同:历史、发展与新挑战]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016 May;39(5):281-287.
4
Sharing regulatory data as tools for strengthening health systems in the Region of the Americas.共享监管数据作为加强美洲区域卫生系统的工具。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016 May;39(5):245-254.
5
Drug Shortages, Today and Tomorrow-An Industry Perspective.药物短缺:现状与未来——行业视角
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2015 Jul-Aug;69(4):557-61. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2015.01066.
6
Development of biosimilars in an era of oncologic drug shortages.肿瘤药物短缺时代生物类似药的发展
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Jun 24;9:3247-55. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S75219. eCollection 2015.
7
Monitoring the quality of medicines: results from Africa, Asia, and South America.药品质量监测:非洲、亚洲和南美洲的结果
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Jun;92(6 Suppl):68-74. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0535. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
8
Good manufacturing practices for medicinal products for human use.人用药品生产质量管理规范
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Apr-Jun;7(2):87-96. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.154424.
9
Causes of drug shortages in the legal pharmaceutical framework.合法制药框架下药品短缺的原因。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;71(2):251-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
10
Critical drug shortages: implications for emergency medicine.关键药物短缺:对急诊医学的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;21(6):704-11. doi: 10.1111/acem.12389.