Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA), Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade de Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 8;13(8):e0202084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202084. eCollection 2018.
The circulation of poor quality medicines, especially in the developing countries, is a public health concern. Compliance with good manufacturing practices (GMP) is essential to ensure the quality, efficacy, and safety of medicines. This study evaluated the outcomes of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency's (ANVISA) international inspections of two years (2015 and 2016) and compared these to those of other regulatory authorities. The information from 255 inspection reports was analyzed, and the type and extent of deficiencies were collected. In the period evaluated, 62.75% of ANVISA-inspected companies were classified as GMP "satisfactory," 24.71% were classified as having "on demand" status, and 12.55% of inspections concluded that the company did not comply with Brazilian GMP regulations ("unsatisfactory"). The most common areas of deficiency were documentation (28.63%) and premises (26.27%). The pattern of deficiencies was similar to the findings of other regulatory agencies. However, ANVISA detected a more significant number of non-compliance results than other authorities, which may be caused by differences in classifications adopted by each Agency. Furthermore, manufacturers inspected by ANVISA may follow different standards and practices for products manufactured for the Brazilian market. Disclosure of main GMP deficiencies found can be useful for encouraging the industry to comply with GMP, and additional guidelines in the specific areas where deficiencies are often identified may be useful to industry to improve GMP compliance. Harmonization of GMP guidelines and inspection procedures are the key steps to avoid duplicate work, but regulatory authorities also need to work together to enforce the proper level of GMP compliance by pharmaceutical manufacturers, assuring high quality and safe medicines supply.
劣质药品的流通,尤其是在发展中国家,是一个公共卫生关注的问题。遵守良好生产规范(GMP)对于确保药品的质量、疗效和安全性至关重要。本研究评估了巴西卫生监管机构(ANVISA)两年(2015 年和 2016 年)国际检查的结果,并将这些结果与其他监管机构进行了比较。分析了 255 份检查报告的信息,并收集了缺陷的类型和程度。在所评估的期间,62.75%接受 ANVISA 检查的公司被归类为 GMP“满意”,24.71%被归类为“按需”状态,12.55%的检查结论为公司不符合巴西 GMP 规定(“不满意”)。最常见的缺陷领域是文件(28.63%)和场所(26.27%)。缺陷模式与其他监管机构的发现相似。然而,ANVISA 检测到的不合规结果数量多于其他机构,这可能是由于每个机构采用的分类方法不同所致。此外,ANVISA 检查的制造商可能为巴西市场生产的产品遵循不同的标准和实践。披露发现的主要 GMP 缺陷可以有助于鼓励行业遵守 GMP,并且在经常发现缺陷的特定领域增加指南可能有助于行业提高 GMP 合规性。GMP 指南和检查程序的协调是避免重复工作的关键步骤,但监管机构也需要共同努力,确保制药制造商适当遵守 GMP 规定,确保高质量和安全的药品供应。