Ms. Bouchery, Ms. Siegwarth, Ms. Natzke, Ms. Lyons, Ms. Miller, Dr. Ireys, and Dr. Brown are with Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, D.C. At the time of this research. Ms. Argomaniz, an independent consultant, was affiliated with Kitsap Mental Health Services, Bremerton, Washington, where Ms. Doan is affiliated.
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Oct 1;69(10):1075-1080. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700450. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
This study examined whether implementing a whole health care model in a community mental health center reduced the use of acute care services and total Medicare expenditures. The whole health care model embedded monitoring of overall health and wellness education within the center's outpatient mental and substance use disorder treatment services, and it improved care coordination with primary care providers.
This study used fee-for-service Medicare administrative claims and enrollment data for June 2009 through July 2015 for the intervention (N=846) and matched comparison group (N=2,643) to estimate a difference-in-differences model.
For the first two-and-a-half years of the program, Medicare expenditures decreased by $266 per month on average for each enrolled beneficiary in the intervention group relative to the comparison group (p<.01). Intervention clients had .02 fewer hospitalizations, .03 fewer emergency department (ED) visits, and .13 fewer office visits per month relative to the comparison group (p<.05 for all estimates).
Overall, the whole health model reduced Medicare expenditures, ED visits, and hospitalization rates. These results may be due in part to the availability of more comprehensive medical data and staff's improved awareness of client's overall health needs. There was a lag between initial program implementation and the program's substantial impact on health expenditures. This lag may be attributed to the substantial transformation and time needed for staff to adapt to the program.
本研究旨在探讨在社区心理健康中心实施整体医疗保健模式是否能减少急性护理服务的使用和医疗保险总支出。整体医疗保健模式在该中心的门诊精神和物质使用障碍治疗服务中嵌入了整体健康和健康教育培训,并改善了与初级保健提供者的护理协调。
本研究使用了 2009 年 6 月至 2015 年 7 月的医疗保险按服务收费管理索赔和登记数据,对干预组(N=846)和匹配的对照组(N=2643)进行了差异-差异模型估计。
在该项目的头两年半,与对照组相比,干预组中每位参保受益人的医疗保险支出平均每月减少 266 美元(p<.01)。干预组患者的住院率每月减少 0.02 次,急诊部(ED)就诊率每月减少 0.03 次,门诊就诊率每月减少 0.13 次(所有估计值均<.05)。
总体而言,整体医疗模式降低了医疗保险支出、急诊就诊率和住院率。这些结果可能部分归因于更全面的医疗数据的可用性和工作人员对客户整体健康需求的认识提高。在项目实施初期和对医疗保险支出产生实质性影响之间存在滞后。这种滞后可能归因于工作人员需要大量的时间来适应该项目。