Amjad Halima, Carmichael Donald, Austin Andrea M, Chang Chiang-Hua, Bynum Julie P W
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire.
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1371-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3553.
Poor continuity of care may contribute to high health care spending and adverse patient outcomes in dementia.
To examine the association between medical clinician continuity and health care utilization, testing, and spending in older adults with dementia.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a study of an observational retrospective cohort from the 2012 national sample in fee-for-service Medicare, conducted from July to December 2015, using inverse probability weighted analysis. A total of 1 416 369 continuously enrolled, community-dwelling, fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with a claims-based dementia diagnosis and at least 4 ambulatory visits in 2012 were included.
Continuity of care score measured on patient visits across physicians over 12 months. A higher continuity score is assigned to visit patterns in which a larger share of the patient's total visits are with fewer clinicians. Score range from 0 to 1 was examined in low-, medium-, and high-continuity tertiles.
Outcomes include all-cause hospitalization, ambulatory care sensitive condition hospitalization, emergency department visit, imaging, and laboratory testing (computed tomographic [CT] scan of the head, chest radiography, urinalysis, and urine culture), and health care spending (overall, hospital and skilled nursing facility, and physician).
Beneficiaries with dementia who had lower levels of continuity of care were younger, had a higher income, and had more comorbid medical conditions. Almost 50% of patients had at least 1 hospitalization and emergency department visit during the year. Utilization was lower with increasing level of continuity. Specifically comparing the highest- vs lowest-continuity groups, annual rates per beneficiary of hospitalization (0.83 vs 0.88), emergency department visits (0.84 vs 0.99), CT scan of the head (0.71 vs 0.83), urinalysis (0.72 vs 1.09), and health care spending (total spending, $22 004 vs $24 371) were higher with lower continuity even after accounting for sociodemographic factors and comorbidity burden (P < .001 for all comparisons). The rate of ambulatory care sensitive condition hospitalization was similar across continuity groups.
Among older fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with a dementia diagnosis, lower continuity of care is associated with higher rates of hospitalization, emergency department visits, testing, and health care spending. Further research into these relationships, including potentially relevant clinical, clinician, and systems factors, can inform whether improving continuity of care in this population may benefit patients and the wider health system.
护理连续性不佳可能导致痴呆症患者的医疗保健支出增加和不良患者结局。
研究老年痴呆症患者中医疗临床医生连续性与医疗保健利用、检查及支出之间的关联。
设计、背景和参与者:这是一项对2012年按服务收费的医疗保险全国样本进行的观察性回顾性队列研究,于2015年7月至12月进行,采用逆概率加权分析。纳入了1416369名连续参保、居住在社区、按服务收费的医疗保险受益人,年龄在65岁及以上,有基于索赔的痴呆症诊断且在2012年至少有4次门诊就诊。
在12个月内跨医生的患者就诊中测量的护理连续性得分。连续性得分越高,表明患者总就诊次数中较大比例是与较少临床医生进行的就诊模式。在低、中、高连续性三分位数中检查了范围从0到1的得分。
结局包括全因住院、门诊护理敏感状况住院、急诊就诊、影像学检查和实验室检查(头部计算机断层扫描[CT]、胸部X光、尿液分析和尿培养)以及医疗保健支出(总体、医院和熟练护理设施以及医生方面的支出)。
护理连续性水平较低的痴呆症受益人更年轻、收入更高且有更多合并症。近50%的患者在这一年中至少有1次住院和急诊就诊。随着连续性水平提高利用率降低。具体比较最高连续性组与最低连续性组,即使在考虑了社会人口统计学因素和合并症负担后,每位受益人的年度住院率(0.83对0.88)、急诊就诊率(0.84对0.99)、头部CT扫描率(0.71对0.83)、尿液分析率(0.72对1.09)以及医疗保健支出(总支出,22004美元对24371美元)在连续性较低时更高(所有比较P<0.001)。各连续性组的门诊护理敏感状况住院率相似。
在诊断为痴呆症的老年按服务收费医疗保险受益人中,护理连续性较低与更高的住院率、急诊就诊率、检查率和医疗保健支出相关。对这些关系进行进一步研究,包括潜在相关的临床、临床医生和系统因素,可以为改善该人群的护理连续性是否可能使患者和更广泛的卫生系统受益提供信息。