Suppr超能文献

医院出院数据低估了谵妄的发生率:一项主要澳大利亚医疗服务机构谵妄时点患病率调查的结果。

Hospital discharge data under-reports delirium occurrence: results from a point prevalence survey of delirium in a major Australian health service.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2019 Mar;49(3):338-344. doi: 10.1111/imj.14066.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium in hospitalised patients is common, and a risk factor for adverse outcomes. Health services require accurate delirium data to monitor the impact of initiatives designed to improve detection and prevention of delirium.

AIM

To determine the extent to which International Classification of Disease codes represent delirium occurrence.

METHODS

A cross-sectional point prevalence survey was used to audit delirium occurrence in 25 inpatient wards of an Australian health service. All adult patients were eligible. Exclusion was for coma, end of life or behaviour that posed a risk to delirium assessors. Specially trained nurses and allied health professionals (AHP) screened patients for any cognitive impairment using the 4 A's Test (4AT). Those with abnormal screen test results were assessed using the '3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for the Confusion Assessment Method' (3D-CAM). Delirium detected by 3D-CAM was the reference standard.

RESULTS

Of potentially eligible patients, 559 of 667 (83.8%) patients were assessed. The mean age was 73 years (±16.4), 54.5% were female and 43.8% (245/559) had cognitive impairment (4AT score ≥1). The occurrence of delirium during hospitalisation as identified by ICD codes was 10.4% (58/559; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.9-12.7) compared with a point prevalence of 16.2% (91/559; 95% CI, 13.2-19.1). Only 31 of 91 (34.1%) of those with delirium had ICD delirium codes assigned.

CONCLUSION

ICD coding is inadequate to determine in-hospital delirium incidence. Instead, a point prevalence detection of delirium using the methods described above could be used. Health services could apply the described survey method to evaluate their local initiatives for the improvement of delirium detection and prevention.

摘要

背景

住院患者的谵妄很常见,是不良结局的一个危险因素。卫生服务机构需要准确的谵妄数据来监测旨在提高谵妄检测和预防效果的各项举措的影响。

目的

确定国际疾病分类(ICD)代码在多大程度上代表了谵妄的发生情况。

方法

采用横断面时点患病率调查的方法,对澳大利亚某卫生服务机构的 25 个住院病房的谵妄发生情况进行了审核。所有成年患者均符合纳入标准。排除标准为昏迷、临终状态或对谵妄评估者构成风险的行为。经过专门培训的护士和辅助医疗专业人员(AHP)使用 4A 测试(4AT)对所有认知障碍患者进行筛查。对筛查测试结果异常的患者使用“3 分钟诊断性谵妄评估方法访谈”(3D-CAM)进行评估。3D-CAM 检测到的谵妄作为参考标准。

结果

在潜在符合条件的患者中,对 667 例患者中的 559 例(83.8%)进行了评估。患者的平均年龄为 73 岁(±16.4),54.5%为女性,43.8%(245/559)存在认知障碍(4AT 评分≥1)。通过 ICD 代码确定的住院期间谵妄发生率为 10.4%(58/559;95%置信区间[CI],7.9-12.7),而时点患病率为 16.2%(91/559;95%CI,13.2-19.1)。在发生谵妄的 91 例患者中,仅有 31 例(34.1%)被分配了 ICD 谵妄代码。

结论

ICD 编码不足以确定住院期间谵妄的发生率。相反,可以使用上述方法对谵妄进行时点患病率检测。卫生服务机构可以应用上述调查方法来评估其改善谵妄检测和预防效果的本地举措。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验