Suppr超能文献

通过自我报告评估创伤史的方法学考虑因素。

Methodological considerations for assessing trauma history via self-report.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Trauma. 2019 Jul;11(5):505-512. doi: 10.1037/tra0000398. Epub 2018 Aug 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

One must first experience a traumatic event (Criterion A in the ; 5th ed.; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013) to be diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Standard procedures for assessing Criterion A (i.e., the "worst-event" method) may result in misidentification of trauma exposure status. The purpose of this Internet-based study was to obtain an estimate of the percent of an adult sample that is misidentified as non-Criterion A through use of this method.

METHOD

Two separate samples completed the extended version of the Life Events Checklist for (LEC-5; Weathers, Blake, et al., 2013b). Sample 1 participants ( = 579) completed the LEC-5 via the traditional worst-event method, while Sample 2 participants ( = 569) completed follow-up questions for every event endorsed on the LEC-5, as well as a measure of posttraumatic stress symptoms.

RESULTS

The majority of each sample identified a worst event that met Criterion A (Sample 1 = 58.5%; Sample 2 = 54.3%). Of the 202 participants in Sample 2 whose worst event did not meet Criterion A, 69.6% reported at least one other Criterion A event. Additionally, posttraumatic stress symptoms (i.e., severity and factor structure) in Sample 2 did not differ between those with a worst event that met Criterion A and those with a secondary event that met Criterion A, even though the identified worst event did not.

CONCLUSIONS

When assessing trauma exposure via self-report, a written narrative and follow-up questions should be requested for all events that are endorsed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

要诊断创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),必须先经历创伤事件(DSM-5 中的;第 5 版;美国精神病学协会[APA],2013)。评估标准 A(即“最严重事件”方法)的标准程序可能导致创伤暴露状况的错误识别。本基于互联网的研究旨在通过使用该方法估计成年人样本中因使用这种方法而被错误识别为非标准 A 的百分比。

方法

两个独立的样本使用扩展版生活事件检查表完成了(LEC-5;Weathers,Blake 等人,2013b)。样本 1 的参与者(n=579)通过传统的最严重事件方法完成了 LEC-5,而样本 2 的参与者(n=569)完成了 LEC-5 上每一个被认可事件的后续问题,以及创伤后应激症状的测量。

结果

大多数样本都确定了一个符合标准 A 的最严重事件(样本 1=58.5%;样本 2=54.3%)。在样本 2 中,202 名最严重事件不符合标准 A 的参与者中,有 69.6%报告了至少一次其他符合标准 A 的事件。此外,样本 2 中的创伤后应激症状(即严重程度和因素结构)在符合标准 A 的最严重事件和符合标准 A 的次要事件的参与者之间没有差异,尽管确定的最严重事件没有差异。

结论

通过自我报告评估创伤暴露时,应要求对所有被认可的事件提供书面叙述和后续问题。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验