• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过自我报告评估创伤史的方法学考虑因素。

Methodological considerations for assessing trauma history via self-report.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Trauma. 2019 Jul;11(5):505-512. doi: 10.1037/tra0000398. Epub 2018 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1037/tra0000398
PMID:30091617
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

One must first experience a traumatic event (Criterion A in the ; 5th ed.; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013) to be diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Standard procedures for assessing Criterion A (i.e., the "worst-event" method) may result in misidentification of trauma exposure status. The purpose of this Internet-based study was to obtain an estimate of the percent of an adult sample that is misidentified as non-Criterion A through use of this method.

METHOD

Two separate samples completed the extended version of the Life Events Checklist for (LEC-5; Weathers, Blake, et al., 2013b). Sample 1 participants ( = 579) completed the LEC-5 via the traditional worst-event method, while Sample 2 participants ( = 569) completed follow-up questions for every event endorsed on the LEC-5, as well as a measure of posttraumatic stress symptoms.

RESULTS

The majority of each sample identified a worst event that met Criterion A (Sample 1 = 58.5%; Sample 2 = 54.3%). Of the 202 participants in Sample 2 whose worst event did not meet Criterion A, 69.6% reported at least one other Criterion A event. Additionally, posttraumatic stress symptoms (i.e., severity and factor structure) in Sample 2 did not differ between those with a worst event that met Criterion A and those with a secondary event that met Criterion A, even though the identified worst event did not.

CONCLUSIONS

When assessing trauma exposure via self-report, a written narrative and follow-up questions should be requested for all events that are endorsed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

要诊断创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),必须先经历创伤事件(DSM-5 中的;第 5 版;美国精神病学协会[APA],2013)。评估标准 A(即“最严重事件”方法)的标准程序可能导致创伤暴露状况的错误识别。本基于互联网的研究旨在通过使用该方法估计成年人样本中因使用这种方法而被错误识别为非标准 A 的百分比。

方法

两个独立的样本使用扩展版生活事件检查表完成了(LEC-5;Weathers,Blake 等人,2013b)。样本 1 的参与者(n=579)通过传统的最严重事件方法完成了 LEC-5,而样本 2 的参与者(n=569)完成了 LEC-5 上每一个被认可事件的后续问题,以及创伤后应激症状的测量。

结果

大多数样本都确定了一个符合标准 A 的最严重事件(样本 1=58.5%;样本 2=54.3%)。在样本 2 中,202 名最严重事件不符合标准 A 的参与者中,有 69.6%报告了至少一次其他符合标准 A 的事件。此外,样本 2 中的创伤后应激症状(即严重程度和因素结构)在符合标准 A 的最严重事件和符合标准 A 的次要事件的参与者之间没有差异,尽管确定的最严重事件没有差异。

结论

通过自我报告评估创伤暴露时,应要求对所有被认可的事件提供书面叙述和后续问题。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Methodological considerations for assessing trauma history via self-report.通过自我报告评估创伤史的方法学考虑因素。
Psychol Trauma. 2019 Jul;11(5):505-512. doi: 10.1037/tra0000398. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
2
Exploring false negatives in self-reported trauma exposure status.探讨自我报告创伤暴露状况中的假阴性。
Psychol Trauma. 2024 Nov;16(8):1409-1415. doi: 10.1037/tra0001635. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
3
Comparing the diagnosis of PTSD when assessing worst versus multiple traumatic events in a chronically mentally ill sample.比较在评估慢性精神疾病样本中最坏和多次创伤性事件时 PTSD 的诊断。
J Trauma Stress. 2011 Jun;24(3):361-4. doi: 10.1002/jts.20647. Epub 2011 May 18.
4
Low reliability when determining criterion a for posttraumatic stress disorder from self-report descriptions of traumatic events: The need for transparent methods.自陈式创伤事件描述用于创伤后应激障碍诊断标准 A 时可靠性低:需要透明的方法。
Psychol Trauma. 2024 Mar;16(3):435-442. doi: 10.1037/tra0001477. Epub 2023 May 4.
5
Screening for PTSD among detained adolescents: Implications of the changes in the DSM-5.被拘留青少年中创伤后应激障碍的筛查:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版变化的影响
Psychol Trauma. 2017 Jan;9(1):10-17. doi: 10.1037/tra0000156. Epub 2016 May 23.
6
Does requiring trauma exposure affect rates of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD? Implications for DSM-5.要求有创伤暴露经历是否会影响国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性PTSD的发病率?对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)的启示。
Psychol Trauma. 2021 Feb;13(2):133-141. doi: 10.1037/tra0000908. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
Preliminary psychometrics of the Structured Trauma-Related Experiences and Symptoms Screener for Adults (STRESS-A) in an urban prenatal healthcare clinic.成人结构性创伤相关经历和症状筛查表(STRESS-A)在城市产前保健诊所的初步心理测量学研究。
Psychol Trauma. 2019 Nov;11(8):927-935. doi: 10.1037/tra0000476. Epub 2019 May 27.
8
Variations in Criterion A and PTSD rates in a community sample of women.社区女性样本中 A 标准和 PTSD 发生率的变化。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Mar;25(2):176-84. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.08.018. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
9
Assessing posttraumatic stress disorder with or without reference to a single, worst traumatic event: examining differences in factor structure.评估是否参考单一的最严重创伤事件的创伤后应激障碍:检验因子结构的差异。
Psychol Assess. 2009 Dec;21(4):629-34. doi: 10.1037/a0016677.
10
Confirmatory factor analyses of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in psychiatric samples differing in Criterion A status.DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍症状在符合和不符合诊断标准 A 的精神科样本中的验证性因素分析。
J Anxiety Disord. 2015 Aug;34:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.05.009. Epub 2015 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissociation and other trauma symptomatology are linked to imbalance in the competing neurobehavioral decision systems.分离及其他创伤症状与相互竞争的神经行为决策系统失衡有关。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 31;14:1317088. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1317088. eCollection 2023.
2
Executive functioning deficits exacerbate posttraumatic stress symptoms: A longitudinal mediation model.执行功能缺陷加剧创伤后应激症状:纵向中介模型。
J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Apr;87:102556. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102556. Epub 2022 Mar 5.