Suppr超能文献

要求有创伤暴露经历是否会影响国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性PTSD的发病率?对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)的启示。

Does requiring trauma exposure affect rates of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD? Implications for DSM-5.

作者信息

Hyland Philip, Karatzias Thanos, Shevlin Mark, McElroy Eoin, Ben-Ezra Menachem, Cloitre Marylène, Brewin Chris R

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

School of Health and Social Care.

出版信息

Psychol Trauma. 2021 Feb;13(2):133-141. doi: 10.1037/tra0000908. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is little evidence that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is more likely to follow traumatic events defined by Criterion A than non-Criterion A stressors. Criterion A events might have greater predictive validity for International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 PTSD, which is a condition more narrowly defined by core features. We evaluated the impact of using Criterion A, an expanded trauma definition in line with ICD-11 guidelines, and no exposure criterion on rates of ICD-11 PTSD and Complex PTSD (CPTSD). We also assessed whether 5 psychologically threatening events included in the expanded definition were as strongly associated with PTSD and CPTSD as standard Criterion A events.

METHOD

A nationally representative sample from Ireland ( = 1,020) completed self-report measures.

RESULTS

Most participants were trauma-exposed based on Criterion A (82%) and the expanded (88%) criterion. When no exposure criterion was used, 13.7% met diagnostic requirements for PTSD or CPTSD, 13.2% when the expanded criterion was used, and 13.2% when Criterion A was used. The 5 psychologically threatening events were as strongly associated with PTSD and CPTSD as the Criterion A events. In a multivariate analysis, only the psychologically threatening events were significantly associated with PTSD (stalking) and CPTSD (bullying, emotional abuse, and neglect).

CONCLUSIONS

Certain non-Criterion A events involving extreme fear and horror should be considered traumatic. The ICD-11 approach of providing clinical guidance rather than a formal definition offers a viable solution to some of the problems associated with the current and previous attempts to define traumatic exposure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

几乎没有证据表明创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)在符合A标准定义的创伤事件后比不符合A标准的应激源更易发生。A标准事件对于国际疾病分类(ICD)-11 PTSD可能具有更高的预测效度,ICD-11 PTSD是一种由核心特征更狭义定义的疾病。我们评估了使用A标准(一种符合ICD-11指南的扩展创伤定义)和无暴露标准对ICD-11 PTSD和复杂性PTSD(CPTSD)发生率的影响。我们还评估了扩展定义中包含的5种心理威胁事件与PTSD和CPTSD的关联强度是否与标准A标准事件一样强。

方法

来自爱尔兰的具有全国代表性的样本(n = 1020)完成了自我报告测量。

结果

根据A标准(82%)和扩展标准(88%),大多数参与者都经历过创伤。当不使用暴露标准时,13.7%的人符合PTSD或CPTSD的诊断要求;使用扩展标准时为13.2%;使用A标准时为13.2%。这5种心理威胁事件与PTSD和CPTSD的关联强度与A标准事件相同。在多变量分析中,只有心理威胁事件与PTSD(跟踪)和CPTSD(欺凌、情感虐待和忽视)显著相关。

结论

某些涉及极度恐惧和恐怖的非A标准事件应被视为创伤性事件。ICD-11提供临床指导而非正式定义的方法为解决当前和以往定义创伤暴露尝试中出现的一些问题提供了可行的解决方案。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验