• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国一个大型参保人群中皮下免疫疗法的成本。

Cost of subcutaneous immunotherapy in a large insured population in the United States.

机构信息

a Optum , Eden Prairie , MN , USA.

b Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence , Merck, Sharp, & Dohme Inc. , Lebanon , NJ , USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Feb;35(2):351-358. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1510386. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2018.1510386
PMID:30091647
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Allergic rhinitis (AR) affects up to 40% of the United States population, with approximately $11 billion annual medical costs. Allergy immunotherapy is the best option for long-term symptomatic relief, but treatment compliance can be low. The objective was to describe subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT)-related costs for patients overall and those with inconsistent treatment.

METHODS

This study observed commercial and Medicare Advantage with Part D health plan enrollees. Included subjects had claims with AR diagnostic codes during 1 January 2011-31 December 2015 and ≥1 SCIT claim during 1 January 2013-31 December 2015 (index date = first SCIT claim date). A control sample was chosen randomly at a 1:3 ratio of SCIT to controls. Inconsistent use was defined as a ≥90 day gap after ≥1 SCIT. Patient characteristics were compared between SCIT patients and controls. Costs were calculated for all SCIT patients and the inconsistent subgroup.

RESULTS

Compared with controls (n = 394,479), SCIT (n = 131,493) patients were younger (39.3 vs. 41.4 years), more likely female (56.4% vs. 50.7%) and more likely in a commercial plan (91.6% vs. 83.6%); all p < .001. Among SCIT patients, 15.1% had inconsistent use. Among all SCIT patients, the 3 year total plan-paid SCIT-related costs were $205,741,125 (18% was for inconsistent subgroup) and patient-paid costs were $47,560,450 (15% for inconsistent). Per-member-per-month costs were $0.48 plan-paid and $0.11 patient-paid, with $0.09 plan-paid and $0.02 patient-paid for inconsistent use.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed 15% of patients may have costly inconsistent SCIT treatment. Greater understanding is needed regarding the reasons for inconsistent use of subcutaneous allergy immunotherapy.

摘要

目的

过敏性鼻炎(AR)影响了美国多达 40%的人口,其年医疗费用约为 110 亿美元。过敏免疫疗法是长期缓解症状的最佳选择,但治疗依从性可能较低。本研究旨在描述总体上接受皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)的患者以及治疗不规律患者的 SCIT 相关费用。

方法

本研究观察了商业和 Medicare Advantage 与 Part D 健康计划的参保者。纳入研究的受试者在 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间有 AR 诊断代码的索赔,在 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间有 ≥1 次 SCIT 索赔(索引日期=首次 SCIT 索赔日期)。SCIT 组与对照组的比例为 1:3。不规律使用定义为在 ≥1 次 SCIT 后至少 90 天的差距。比较 SCIT 患者和对照组的患者特征。计算所有 SCIT 患者和不规律亚组的费用。

结果

与对照组(n=394479)相比,SCIT 患者(n=131493)更年轻(39.3 岁 vs. 41.4 岁),女性比例更高(56.4% vs. 50.7%),更有可能参加商业计划(91.6% vs. 83.6%);所有 p 值均<0.001。在 SCIT 患者中,有 15.1%的患者存在不规律使用。在所有 SCIT 患者中,3 年总计划支付的 SCIT 相关费用为 20574.125 万美元(18%用于不规律亚组),患者自付费用为 4756.045 万美元(15%用于不规律)。每位会员每月的计划支付费用为 0.48 美元,患者自付费用为 0.11 美元,不规律使用的计划支付费用为 0.09 美元,患者自付费用为 0.02 美元。

结论

本研究显示,15%的患者可能存在费用较高的不规律 SCIT 治疗。需要进一步了解皮下过敏免疫疗法不规律使用的原因。

相似文献

1
Cost of subcutaneous immunotherapy in a large insured population in the United States.美国一个大型参保人群中皮下免疫疗法的成本。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Feb;35(2):351-358. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1510386. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
2
Healthcare costs for allergic rhinitis patients on allergy immunotherapy: a retrospective observational study.接受过敏免疫疗法的过敏性鼻炎患者的医疗费用:一项回顾性观察研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Nov;33(11):2039-2047. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1359517. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
3
Administration and Burden of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis in U.S. and Canadian Clinical Practice.美国和加拿大临床实践中变应性鼻炎皮下免疫治疗的管理和负担。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Nov;21(11):982-90. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.11.982.
4
Real-world evidence costs of allergic rhinitis and allergy immunotherapy in the commercially insured United States population.真实世界中商业保险覆盖人群变应性鼻炎和变应原免疫治疗的成本。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Jun;37(6):957-965. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1903848. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
5
Indonesia-Based Study of the Clinical and Cost-Saving Benefits of Subcutaneous Allergen Immunotherapy for Children with Allergic Rhinitis in Private Practice.印度尼西亚一项研究:皮下变应原免疫治疗对私人执业中变应性鼻炎儿童的临床和节省成本获益。
Cells. 2021 Jul 20;10(7):1841. doi: 10.3390/cells10071841.
6
Cost-minimization analysis of sublingual immunotherapy versus subcutaneous immunotherapy for house dust mite respiratory allergic disease in Denmark.丹麦针对屋尘螨呼吸道过敏性疾病的舌下免疫疗法与皮下免疫疗法的成本最小化分析。
J Med Econ. 2016 Aug;19(8):735-41. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1158718. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
7
Cost-effectiveness of grass pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) compared to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) and symptomatic treatment in Austria, Spain, and Switzerland.在奥地利、西班牙和瑞士,草花粉皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)与舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)及对症治疗相比的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2018 Apr;21(4):374-381. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1419959. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
8
Cost of allergy immunotherapy: sublingual vs subcutaneous administration.变应原免疫疗法的费用:舌下 vs 皮下给药。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012 Nov;2(6):460-4. doi: 10.1002/alr.21061. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
9
[Evaluation of long-term effect for house dust mite subcutaneous immunotherapy for patients with allergic rhinitis].[尘螨皮下免疫疗法对变应性鼻炎患者的长期疗效评估]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Aug;50(8):632-5.
10
Compliance With Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Appointments in an Urban Tertiary Care Setting.城市三级医疗环境中皮下免疫治疗预约的依从性
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2018 Nov;32(6):473-477. doi: 10.1177/1945892418793518. Epub 2018 Aug 20.