Raus Kasper, Mortier Eric, Eeckloo Kristof
Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, BE.
Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, BE.
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Jul 11;18(3):6. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3960.
Much is changing in health care organization today. A perspective or paradigm that is gaining ever increasing momentum is that of translational, extramural and integrated care. Current research suggests many potential benefits for integrated care and health care networks but the ethical issues are less frequently emphasized. Showing that integrated care can be beneficial, does not mean it is automatically justified. We will argue for three ethical requirements such health care networks should meet. Subsequently we will look at the mechanisms driving the formation of networks and examine how these can cause networks to meet or fail to meet these ethical requirements or obligations. The three mechanisms we will examine are government, civil society and market mechanisms, which, we argue, should be balanced properly. Each mechanism is able to provide a relevant ethical perspective to health care networks. However, when the balance is skewed towards a single mechanism, health care networks might fail to promote one or more of the ethical requirements.
如今,医疗保健机构正在发生诸多变化。一种正获得越来越大势头的观点或范式是转化性、校外和综合医疗保健。当前的研究表明综合医疗保健和医疗保健网络有许多潜在益处,但伦理问题却较少被强调。表明综合医疗保健有益并不意味着它就自动合理。我们将论证医疗保健网络应满足的三项伦理要求。随后,我们将审视推动网络形成的机制,并研究这些机制如何致使网络满足或无法满足这些伦理要求或义务。我们将审视的三种机制是政府、民间社会和市场机制,我们认为这些机制应得到妥善平衡。每种机制都能够为医疗保健网络提供相关的伦理视角。然而,当平衡偏向单一机制时,医疗保健网络可能无法促进一项或多项伦理要求。