Kayatta Michael O, Halkos Michael E, Puskas John D
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Saint Luke's, New York, NY, USA.
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Jul;7(4):500-505. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.06.09.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) has typically been treated either medically, with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). As advances in stent technology and minimally invasive surgery have developed, a third option has emerged: hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR). In HCR, minimally invasive CABG and PCI are both employed to treat a single patient, often during the same hospital stay. Patients appropriate for this technique vary widely, from low-risk patients with low SYNTAX lesions outside the left anterior descending artery (LAD), to high-risk patients with multiple comorbidities who are felt by the heart team to benefit most by avoiding a sternotomy. Across both our experience and other series in the literature, mortality with HCR is around 1%. Hospital length of stay is less than one week, and typically less than after conventional CABG, but longer than with isolated PCI. Return to baseline activity is substantially shorter after minimally invasive CABG compared to conventional CABG due to the avoidance of a sternotomy; deep sternal wound infections are entirely avoided. Mid-term need for repeat revascularization may be higher with HCR, though randomized data are lacking. In conclusion, HCR is an evolving method to treat multivessel CAD with favorable early results in high volume centers, though growth in the field is limited by surgical experience and success with minimally invasive techniques.
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)通常采用药物治疗、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。随着支架技术和微创手术的发展,出现了第三种选择:杂交冠状动脉血运重建术(HCR)。在HCR中,微创CABG和PCI都用于治疗同一患者,通常在同一次住院期间进行。适合这种技术的患者差异很大,从左前降支(LAD)以外低SYNTAX病变的低风险患者,到心脏团队认为避免胸骨切开术获益最大的患有多种合并症的高风险患者。根据我们的经验以及文献中的其他系列报道,HCR的死亡率约为1%。住院时间少于一周,通常比传统CABG后短,但比单纯PCI长。与传统CABG相比,由于避免了胸骨切开术,微创CABG后恢复到基线活动的时间大幅缩短;完全避免了深部胸骨伤口感染。尽管缺乏随机数据,但HCR的中期再次血运重建需求可能更高。总之,HCR是一种治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的不断发展的方法,在高容量中心早期效果良好,不过该领域的发展受到手术经验和微创技术成功率的限制。