Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, USA; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, USA.
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;213:165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.049. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
Message avoidance (e.g., trying not to look at the message) may be motivated by reactance, a maladaptive rejection of the message. An alternative view is that avoidance indicates that a message is eliciting fear and other negative affect, thereby increasing the likelihood of behavioral change. We sought to identify which psychological mechanism-reactance or fear and other negative affect-explains message avoidance. We also examined whether avoidance was associated with more forgoing or butting out of cigarettes.
Trial 1 randomly assigned 2149 adult U.S. smokers to receive either pictorial warnings (intervention) or text-only warnings (control) on their cigarette packs for four weeks in 2014 and 2015. Trial 2 randomly assigned 719 adult U.S. smokers to receive either messages about toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke (intervention) or messages about not littering cigarette butts (control) for three weeks in 2016 and 2017. Negative affect included fear, anxiety, disgust, sadness, and guilt. Reactance included perceived threat to freedom, anger, and counterarguing.
Intervention messages led to greater message avoidance in both trials (both p < .001). In Trial 1, intervention messages elicited greater negative affect, which in turn was associated with greater avoidance (mediated effect = 0.21, p < .001). In contrast, reactance explained only a small part of the effect in Trial 1 (mediated effect = 0.03, p < .001). Similarly, in Trial 2, intervention messages elicited greater negative affect, which was associated with more avoidance (mediated effect = 0.12, p < .001); reactance did not explain any of the effect. In both trials, avoidance was associated with more forgoing or butting out of cigarettes (ps < .001).
Smokers may avoid cigarette pack risk messages because they evoke aversive types of emotion. These studies add to a growing body of evidence that, in the context of cigarette pack messages, avoidance is not a form of defensive processing but instead a sign of deeper processing.
信息回避(例如,尽量不看信息)可能是由逆反心理引起的,这是一种对信息的适应不良的拒绝。另一种观点认为,回避表明信息引起了恐惧和其他负面情绪,从而增加了行为改变的可能性。我们试图确定哪种心理机制——逆反心理或恐惧和其他负面情绪——解释了信息回避。我们还研究了回避是否与更多地放弃或不吸烟有关。
试验 1 在 2014 年和 2015 年的四周内,随机将 2149 名美国成年吸烟者分配到接受烟盒上的图片警告(干预组)或仅文字警告(对照组);试验 2 在 2016 年和 2017 年的三周内,随机将 719 名美国成年吸烟者分配到接受关于香烟烟雾中有毒化学物质的信息(干预组)或关于不乱扔烟头的信息(对照组)。负面情绪包括恐惧、焦虑、厌恶、悲伤和内疚。逆反心理包括对自由受到威胁的感知、愤怒和反驳。
在两项试验中,干预信息都导致了更大的信息回避(均 p<0.001)。在试验 1 中,干预信息引起了更大的负面情绪,而负面情绪又与更大的回避有关(中介效应=0.21,p<0.001)。相比之下,在试验 1 中,逆反心理仅能解释一小部分效果(中介效应=0.03,p<0.001)。同样,在试验 2 中,干预信息引起了更大的负面情绪,这与更多的回避有关(中介效应=0.12,p<0.001);逆反心理没有解释任何效果。在两项试验中,回避与更多地放弃或不吸烟有关(p<0.001)。
吸烟者可能会回避香烟包装上的风险信息,因为这些信息会引起不愉快的情绪。这些研究增加了越来越多的证据,即在香烟包装信息的背景下,回避不是一种防御性处理,而是一种更深入处理的迹象。