Suppr超能文献

系统评价社区参与干预措施对改善南亚农村地区孕产妇健康结局的影响。

Systematic review of community participation interventions to improve maternal health outcomes in rural South Asia.

机构信息

Mothers and Babies Research Centre, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Lookout Rd, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.

The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Aug 10;18(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1964-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is a systematic review on the effectiveness of community interventions in improving maternal health care outcomes in South Asia.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases to June 2017. Randomised or cluster randomised studies in communities within rural/remote areas of Nepal, Bangladesh, India and Pakistan were included. Data were analysed as risk ratios (RR) or odds ratios (OR), and effects were adjusted for clustering. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects and evidence quality was assessed.

RESULTS

Eleven randomised trials were included from 5440 citations. Meta-analysis of all community interventions combined compared with control showed a small improvement in the number of women attending at least one antenatal care visit (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.33). Two community mobilisation sub groups: home care using both male and female mobilisers, and education by community mobilisers, improved the number of women attending at least one antenatal visit. There was no difference in the number of women attending at least one antenatal visit for any other subgroup. There was no difference in the number of women attending 3 or more antenatal visits for all community interventions combined, or any community subgroup. Likewise, there was no difference in attendance at birth between all community interventions combined and control. Health care facility births were modestly increased in women's education groups (adjusted RR (1.15, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.20; 2 studies)). Risk of maternal deaths after 2 years (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.64; 5 studies), and 3 years (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.36; 2 studies), were no different between women's education groups and control. Community level mobilisation rather than health care messages at district level improved the numbers of women giving birth at health care facilities (RR1.09 (95%CI 1.06 to 1.13; 1 study)). Maternal health care knowledge scores improved in two community-based interventions, one involving education of male community members.

CONCLUSION

Women's education interventions may improve the number of women seeking birth at a health care facility, but the evidence is of low quality. No impact on maternal mortality was observed Future research should explore the effectiveness of including male mobilisers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO CRD42016033201 .

摘要

背景

这是一项关于社区干预措施在改善南亚产妇保健结果方面的有效性的系统评价。

方法

我们检索了电子数据库至 2017 年 6 月。纳入了在尼泊尔、孟加拉国、印度和巴基斯坦农村/偏远地区社区内进行的随机或整群随机试验。数据以风险比(RR)或优势比(OR)表示,并对聚类进行了调整。使用随机效应进行了荟萃分析,并评估了证据质量。

结果

从 5440 篇引文中共纳入了 11 项随机试验。与对照组相比,所有社区干预措施综合分析显示,至少接受一次产前护理就诊的妇女数量略有增加(RR1.19,95%CI1.06 至 1.33)。两个社区动员亚组:使用男性和女性动员者的家庭护理,以及社区动员者的教育,增加了至少接受一次产前检查的妇女数量。对于任何其他亚组,在接受至少一次产前检查的妇女数量方面没有差异。所有社区干预措施综合,或任何社区亚组,在接受至少三次产前检查的妇女数量方面没有差异。同样,在所有社区干预措施与对照组之间,分娩时在医疗机构分娩的比例也没有差异。在妇女教育组中,适度增加了医疗保健机构出生的比例(调整后的 RR(1.15,95%CI1.11 至 1.20;2 项研究))。在妇女教育组和对照组之间,两年后(RR0.63,95%CI0.24 至 1.64;5 项研究)和三年后(RR1.11,95%CI0.52 至 2.36;2 项研究)的产妇死亡率风险没有差异。社区一级的动员而不是地区一级的医疗保健信息传递,改善了在医疗保健机构分娩的妇女人数(RR1.09(95%CI1.06 至 1.13;1 项研究))。两项基于社区的干预措施中的产妇保健知识得分有所提高,其中一项涉及对男性社区成员的教育。

结论

妇女教育干预措施可能会增加寻求在医疗机构分娩的妇女人数,但证据质量较低。没有观察到对产妇死亡率的影响。未来的研究应探讨包括男性动员者的有效性。

试验注册

本系统评价在 PROSPERO CRD42016033201 注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d8/6086057/a8de0c64caec/12884_2018_1964_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验