Suppr超能文献

基于 NCCT 和 CTA 的影像学方案在迟发性或觉醒性脑卒中血管内治疗中的选择。

NCCT and CTA-based imaging protocol for endovascular treatment selection in late presenting or wake-up strokes.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho EPE, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.

Department of Imagiology, Neuroradiology Unit, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Feb;11(2):200-203. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014051. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Recently, the benefit of selecting patients for endovascular treatment (EVT) beyond the 6-hour time window using a tissue-based approach was demonstrated in two randomized trials. The optimal imaging protocol for selecting patients is under debate, and it is still unknown if a simpler and faster protocol may adequately select patients with wake-up stroke (WUS) and late-presenting stroke (LPS) for EVT.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of patients submitted to EVT presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset or 6-24 hours after last seen well, selected using non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and CT angiography (CTA).

METHODS

An observational study was performed, which included consecutive patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion treated with EVT. Patients presenting within 6 hours were treated if their NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was ≥6 and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) was ≥6, while patients presenting with WUS or 6-24 hours after last seen well (WUS/LPS) were treated if their NIHSSscore was ≥12 and ASPECTS was ≥7.

RESULTS

249 patients were included, 63 of whom were in the WUS/LPS group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for longer symptom-recanalization time, lower admission NIHSS (16 vs 17, P=0.038), more frequent tandem occlusions (25.4% vs 11.8%, P=0.010), and large artery atherosclerosis etiology (22.2% vs 11.8%, P=0.043) in the WUS/LPS group. No differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, peri-procedural complications or mortality were found between groups. Three-month functional independence was similar in both groups (65.1% in WUS/LPS vs 57.0% in ≤6 hours, P=0.259) and no differences were found after adjustment for confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world observational study suggests that EVT may be safe and effective in patients with WUS and LPS selected using clinical-core mismatch (high NIHSS/high ASPECTS in NCCT).

摘要

介绍

最近,两项随机试验证明了使用基于组织的方法选择超过 6 小时时间窗的患者进行血管内治疗(EVT)的益处。选择患者的最佳成像方案仍存在争议,目前尚不清楚是否更简单、更快的方案是否可以充分选择醒后卒中(WUS)和迟发性卒中(LPS)患者进行 EVT。

目的

比较采用非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)和 CT 血管造影(CTA)选择的症状发作后 6 小时内或最后一次正常后 6-24 小时内接受 EVT 的患者的结局。

方法

进行了一项观察性研究,其中包括接受 EVT 治疗的前循环缺血性卒中伴大血管闭塞的连续患者。如果 NIH 卒中量表(NIHSS)评分≥6 和 Alberta 卒中计划早期 CT 评分(ASPECTS)≥6,则在症状发作后 6 小时内治疗患者,而对于 WUS 或最后一次正常后 6-24 小时(WUS/LPS)的患者,如果 NIHSS 评分≥12 和 ASPECTS≥7,则进行治疗。

结果

共纳入 249 例患者,其中 63 例为 WUS/LPS 组。两组的基线特征相似,但症状再通时间较长(25.4%对 11.8%,P=0.010)、串联闭塞更为常见(22.2%对 11.8%,P=0.043)、入院 NIHSS 评分较低(16 对 17,P=0.038)除外。两组之间未发现症状性颅内出血、围手术期并发症或死亡率的差异。两组 3 个月的功能独立性相似(WUS/LPS 组为 65.1%,≤6 小时组为 57.0%,P=0.259),并且在调整混杂因素后也没有差异。

结论

这项真实世界的观察性研究表明,采用临床核心不匹配(NCCT 中 NIHSS 高/ASPECTS 高)选择 WUS 和 LPS 患者,EVT 可能是安全有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验