Wali Nabila, Stolze Lotte J, Rinkel Leon A, Heldner Mirjam R, Müller Madlaine, Arnold Marcel, Mordasini Pasquale, Gralla Jan, Baumgartner Philipp, Inauen Corinne, Westphal Laura P, Wegener Susanne, Michel Patrik, Trüssel Simon, Mannismäki Laura, Martinez-Majander Nicolas, Curtze Sami, Kägi Georg, Picchetto Livio, Dell'Acqua Maria Luisa, Bigliardi Guido, Riegler Christoph, Nolte Christian H, Serôdio Miguel, Miranda Miguel, Marto João Pedro, Zini Andrea, Forlivesi Stefano, Gentile Luana, Cereda Carlo W, Pezzini Alessandro, Leker Ronen R, Honig Asaf, Berisavac Ivana, Padjen Visnja, Zedde Marialuisa, Kuhrij Laurien S, Van den Berg-Vos Renske M, Engelter Stefan T, Gensicke Henrik, Nederkoorn Paul J
Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Sep 8:23969873241277437. doi: 10.1177/23969873241277437.
After positive findings in clinical trials the time window for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for patients with an acute ischemic stroke has been expanded up to 24 h from symptom onset or last seen well (LSW). We aimed to compare EVT patients' characteristics and outcomes in the early versus extended time window and to compare outcomes with the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trial results.
Consecutive EVT patients from 16 mostly European comprehensive stroke centers from the EVA-TRISP cohort were included. We compared rates of 90-day good functional outcomes (Modified Rankin Scale 0-2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality between patients treated in the early (<6 h after onset or LSW) versus extended (6-24 h after onset or LSW) time windows.
We included 9313 patients, of which 6876 were treated in the early and 2437 in the extended time window. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at presentation was lower in patients treated in the extended time window (median 13 [IQR 7-18] vs 15 [IQR 9-19], < 0.001). The percentage of patients with good functional outcome was slightly lower in the extended time window (37.4% vs 42.2%, < 0.001). However, rates of successful recanalization, sICH, and mortality were similar. Good functional outcome rates after EVT were slightly lower for patients in the extended window in the EVA-TRISP cohort as compared to DAWN and DEFUSE 3.
According to this large multicenter cohort study reflecting daily clinical practice, EVT use in the extended time window appears safe and effective.
在临床试验取得阳性结果后,急性缺血性脑卒中患者血管内血栓切除术(EVT)的时间窗已从症状发作或最后看起来正常(LSW)后延长至24小时。我们旨在比较早期与延长时间窗内接受EVT治疗患者的特征和结局,并将结局与DAWN和DEFUSE 3试验结果进行比较。
纳入了来自EVA-TRISP队列中16个主要位于欧洲的综合卒中中心的连续接受EVT治疗的患者。我们比较了在早期(发作或LSW后<6小时)与延长(发作或LSW后6-24小时)时间窗内接受治疗的患者90天良好功能结局(改良Rankin量表0-2分)、症状性颅内出血(sICH)和90天死亡率的发生率。
我们纳入了9313例患者,其中6876例在早期时间窗接受治疗,2437例在延长时间窗接受治疗。延长时间窗内接受治疗的患者就诊时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分较低(中位数13[四分位间距7-18] vs 15[四分位间距9-19],P<0.001)。延长时间窗内良好功能结局患者的百分比略低(37.4% vs 42.2%,P<0.001)。然而,成功再通率、sICH发生率和死亡率相似。与DAWN和DEFUSE 3相比,EVA-TRISP队列中延长时间窗内接受EVT治疗的患者良好功能结局率略低。
根据这项反映日常临床实践的大型多中心队列研究,在延长时间窗内使用EVT似乎是安全有效的。