Durojaiye Oyewole Christopher, Cartwright Katharine, Ntziora Fotinie
Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK..
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;93(1):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
This study reviews the current OPAT service provision in the UK and evaluates concordance with the national OPAT practice guidelines (standards of care). We conducted a survey of acute hospital trusts and health boards in the UK regarding OPAT practices between June and September 2017. 165 (93%) of the 178 acute hospital trusts/health boards that were contacted responded to the survey. 100 (61%) indicated they had an OPAT service. Ten (10%) OPAT services did not involve an infection specialist. Bone and joint infections, and skin and soft-tissue infections were the most common conditions treated. Most OPAT services (74%) hold weekly multidisciplinary meetings/virtual ward rounds to review patient's progress. 73% had a dedicated OPAT database. We identified variations in practice and concordance with the national OPAT good practice guidelines. In an era of increasing demand for home-based care, further studies are required to identify the optimal configuration of OPAT services with regards to quality and patient safety.
本研究回顾了英国目前的门诊抗菌药物治疗(OPAT)服务提供情况,并评估其与国家OPAT实践指南(护理标准)的一致性。我们于2017年6月至9月对英国的急性医院信托机构和健康委员会进行了一项关于OPAT实践的调查。在被联系的178个急性医院信托机构/健康委员会中,有165个(93%)对调查做出了回应。100个(61%)表示他们有OPAT服务。10个(10%)OPAT服务不涉及感染专科医生。骨与关节感染以及皮肤和软组织感染是最常见的治疗疾病。大多数OPAT服务(74%)每周举行多学科会议/虚拟病房查房以评估患者进展。73%有专门的OPAT数据库。我们发现了实践中的差异以及与国家OPAT良好实践指南的一致性情况。在对居家护理需求不断增加的时代,需要进一步研究以确定OPAT服务在质量和患者安全方面的最佳配置。