Nandakumar Keerthi P, Bhalla Amar P, Pandey Ravindra Kumar, Baidya Dalim Kumar, Subramaniam Rajeshwari, Kashyap Lokesh
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2018 Jul-Sep;12(3):433-439. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_754_17.
The aim of the study was to compare time to intubation and glottic visualization between Macintosh, McCoy, and Glidescope video laryngoscope (GVL) in morbidly obese patients.
Forty-five American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III morbidly obese patients were randomized into three groups of 15 each and time to intubation, Cormack-Lehane grading, and Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS) were compared.
GVL took more time to intubate (TTI) compared to Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscope ( = 0.0001). Overall IDS were similar between the groups.
To conclude, GVL takes longer TTI with no added advantage in IDS and hemodynamic response to intubation in morbidly obese patients. McCoy is only as effective as Macintosh and hence Macintosh laryngoscope should be laryngoscope of choice due to its widespread availability and familiarity.
本研究旨在比较麦金托什喉镜、麦考伊喉镜和Glidescope视频喉镜(GVL)在病态肥胖患者中的插管时间和声门可视化情况。
将45例美国麻醉医师协会I - III级病态肥胖患者随机分为三组,每组15例,比较插管时间、科马克-莱汉内分级和插管难度评分(IDS)。
与麦金托什喉镜和麦考伊喉镜相比,GVL插管时间更长(P = 0.0001)。各组的总体IDS相似。
综上所述,在病态肥胖患者中,GVL的插管时间更长,在IDS和插管的血流动力学反应方面没有额外优势。麦考伊喉镜的效果与麦金托什喉镜相当,因此由于麦金托什喉镜广泛可得且为人熟知,应作为首选喉镜。