Schwarz-Plaschg Claudia
University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
Nanoethics. 2018;12(2):139-153. doi: 10.1007/s11569-018-0315-z. Epub 2018 May 15.
The emergence of new technologies regularly involves comparisons with previous innovations. For instance, analogies with asbestos and genetically modified organisms have played a crucial role in the early societal debate about nanotechnology. This article explores the power of analogies in such debates and how they could be effectively and responsibly employed for imagining and governing emerging technologies in general and nanotechnology in particular. First, the concept of analogical imagination is developed to capture the explorative and anticipatory potential of analogies. Yet analogies do not simply stimulate imagination, they also restrict it by framing emerging technologies in specific ways. Thus, second, the article argues that tracing the rhetorical and persuasive power of analogical arguments is essential for understanding how analogies are constructed to legitimise assessments, funding policies, and governance approaches. Third, the article addresses factors that account for the persuasiveness of analogies in debates about emerging technologies. The article concludes with reflections on how analogical imagination and an enhanced analogical sensibility for framing and persuasive effects can foster responsible research and innovation (RRI).
新技术的出现常常涉及与先前创新的比较。例如,与石棉和转基因生物的类比在早期关于纳米技术的社会辩论中发挥了关键作用。本文探讨了类比在这类辩论中的力量,以及如何能有效且负责任地运用它们来总体设想和管理新兴技术,尤其是纳米技术。首先,发展出类比想象的概念以捕捉类比的探索性和前瞻性潜力。然而,类比并非仅仅激发想象,它们还通过以特定方式构建新兴技术来对其加以限制。因此,其次,本文认为追踪类比论证的修辞和说服力对于理解如何构建类比以使评估、资助政策和治理方法合法化至关重要。第三,本文探讨了在关于新兴技术的辩论中导致类比具有说服力的因素。文章最后思考了类比想象以及对构建框架和说服效果更强的类比敏感性如何能够促进负责任的研究与创新(RRI)。