Salvatori Andrea
1OECD, Paris, France.
2ISER, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
J Labour Mark Res. 2018;52(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12651-018-0242-z. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
This paper studies the contribution of different skill groups to the polarisation of the UK labour market. We show that the large increase in graduate numbers contributed to the substantial reallocation of employment from middling to top occupations which is the main feature of the polarisation process in the UK over the past three decades. The increase in the number of immigrants, on the other hand, does not account for any particular aspect of the polarisation in the UK. Changes in the skill mix of the workforce account for most of the decline in routine employment across the occupational distribution, but within-group changes account for most of the decline in routine occupations in middling occupations. In addition, there is no clear indication of polarisation all skill groups-a fact that previous literature has cited as evidence that technology drives the decline of middling occupations. These findings differ substantially from previous evidence on the US and cast doubts on the role of technology as the main driver of polarisation in the UK.
本文研究了不同技能群体对英国劳动力市场两极分化的贡献。我们表明,毕业生数量的大幅增加促成了就业从中等职业向高端职业的大量重新分配,这是过去三十年英国两极分化进程的主要特征。另一方面,移民数量的增加并不能解释英国两极分化的任何特定方面。劳动力技能组合的变化在职业分布中占常规就业下降的大部分,但群体内部变化在中等职业的常规职业下降中占大部分。此外,没有明确迹象表明所有技能群体都存在两极分化——这一事实被先前的文献引为技术导致中等职业衰落的证据。这些发现与之前关于美国的证据有很大不同,并对技术作为英国两极分化主要驱动因素的作用提出了质疑。